Pass the Cisco CyberOps Professional 350-201 Questions and answers with ValidTests

After utilizing interactive behavior analysis in a sandbox environment, the next step in malware analysis is typically to disassemble the malware. This process involves breaking down the executable into assembly code to understand its structure and functionality. Disassembly allows the engineer to see the instructions that the malware executes, which can provide insights into its capabilities and purpose

The behaviors that triggered the User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) are the employee logging in during non-working hours and from a first-seen country. UEBA systems are designed to detect anomalies in user behavior that could indicate security threats. Logging in from a new location, especially during unusual hours, deviates from the user’s typical behavior patterns and raises flags about potential unauthorized access or compromised credentials.

To reduce the number of false positive events about brute force attempts on the organization’s mail server, the Snort rule should be modified to tune the count and seconds threshold. This adjustment will help in defining what constitutes normal versus suspicious activity patterns more accurately. By setting a higher count or longer time threshold, the rule will be less likely to trigger on normal login attempts, thus reducing false positives.

References:

Snort User Manual: Provides guidance on configuring and tuning Snort rules.

Best Practices for IDS Configuration: Offers strategies for reducing false positives in intrusion detection systems.

The threat model for the SQL database, given that it manages transactions, access control, and atomicity, is primarily concerned with the confidentiality and integrity of the data. An attacker who gains access to the database could potentially read sensitive information or modify data, which could lead to unauthorized transactions, access control breaches, or compromise the atomicity of database operations. Therefore, the most pertinent threat is that an attacker can read or change data within the database.

References:

Understanding Cisco CyberOps Using Core Security Technologies (CBRCOR) course material would cover the various threats to databases and the importance of securing them against unauthorized access or modification.

The Cisco Certified CyberOps Associate certification includes knowledge about identifying and protecting against threats to critical infrastructure, such as SQL databases.

To prevent DDoS attacks while accommodating legitimate high-volume requests from trusted services, it’s advisable to implement rate limiting. This involves setting a threshold for the number of requests that can be made to an API within a certain time frame. If this limit is exceeded, access should be temporarily blocked, and a 429 HTTP error code (“Too Many Requests”) should be returned. This allows legitimate users to be throttled rather than completely cut off, preserving functionality while protecting against abuse.

Prioritizing vulnerabilities for handling is a critical process that depends on various factors, including the nature of the institution and the context in which the devices are deployed. Vulnerability #1, which affects the Command Line Interpreter (CLI) of ACME Super Firewall, could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands with administrative rights. This type of vulnerability is particularly severe because it could lead to complete system compromise. However, it requires the attacker to be logged in to the device, which adds a layer of difficulty for exploitation.

Vulnerability #2 affects the web-based management interface of ACME Router models 1010 and 1020, allowing an attacker to bypass authorization checks. This vulnerability is also critical as it can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information and system configuration. Unlike Vulnerability #1, it does not require the attacker to be logged in, making it easier to exploit.

The prioritization of these vulnerabilities would depend on the specific deployment scenario of the institution. For example, an institution that heavily relies on remote management of devices may prioritize Vulnerability #2 higher due to its remote exploitability. Conversely, an institution with strict access controls and limited remote access might prioritize Vulnerability #1 due to the potential for internal threats.

Continuous delivery is a software development approach that enables teams to produce software in short cycles, ensuring that the software can be reliably released at any time. It aims to build, test, and release software with greater speed and frequency. This approach helps in closing feedback loops and enables teams to quickly apply patches, making it ideal for situations where code updates need to reach the market as often as possible

The engineers should first determine the type of data stored on the affected asset and document the access logs to understand the potential impact of the unknown application. Engaging the incident response team is crucial for a coordinatedresponse to the security issue. Additionally, identifying who installed the application by reviewing the logs and gathering a user access log from the HR department will help trace the origin of the application and assess the extent of the unauthorized activity

According to the NIST.SP 800-150 guide to cyber threat information sharing, before uploading an infected file containing sensitive information to a hybrid-analysis sandbox, the analyst is required to remove all personally identifiable information (PII) to safeguard privacy. This step is crucial to protect the identities of individuals and comply with privacy laws and regulations. PII includes any data that could potentially identify a specific individual, such as names, addresses, social security numbers, and other identifiers1.

References:

NIST.SP 800-150 provides guidelines for cyber threat information sharing, which includes the handling of sensitive information and the importance of removing PII to maintain privacy and security

Automation refers to the configuration of a single process or a small number of related tasks to run without human intervention. Orchestration, on the other hand, involves managing multiple automated tasks to create a dynamic workflow. While automation focuses on making individual tasks more efficient, orchestration looks at the bigger picture to optimize a series of tasks that make up a process