ACAMS AML Certifications CAMS-FCI Question # 27 Topic 3 Discussion
CAMS-FCI Exam Topic 3 Question 27 Discussion:
Question #: 27
Topic #: 3
Why is a more robust supervisory approach needed by regulators when overseeing small- and medium-sized money service businesses (MSBs) compared to larger MSBs for combatting terrorist financing (TF)?
A.
Small- and medium-sized MSBs need to be targeted to ensure that competition in the industry remains constant and uniform.
B.
Small- and medium-sized MSBs need to be robustly supervised so the regulator can maintain visibility in combatting TF.
C.
Small- and medium-sized MSBs are more likely to falsify records to appear less risky in order to keep the banking relationship.
D.
Small- and medium-sized MSBs are more at risk of allowing transactions linked to TF due to the lack of skilled compliance resources.
A more robust supervisory approach is needed by regulators when overseeing small- and medium-sized MSBs compared to larger MSBs for combatting TF because small- and medium-sized MSBs are more at risk of allowing transactions linked to TF due to the lack of skilled compliance resources. Small- and medium-sized MSBs may face challenges in implementing effective AML/CFT controls, such as conducting risk assessments, applying customer due diligence measures, monitoring transactions, detecting suspicious activities, and reporting to the authorities. They may also have limited access to training, guidance, and tools to enhance their compliance capabilities. Therefore, regulators need to provide more supervision and support to small- and medium-sized MSBs to ensure that they comply with the AML/CFT requirements and mitigate the TF risks.
References:
Sustainable Growth for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises … - MDPI
Lessons on Resilience for Small and Midsize Businesses - HBR
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit