The ICF Code of Ethics (Section 2.5) requires coaches to "refer clients to other professionals when appropriate," such as when mental health concerns arise outside coaching’s scope (ICF Coaching Boundaries). If there’s no immediate danger, the coach continues within their role while suggesting support. The options provided seem misaligned, so I’ll interpret based on ICF standards:
A. Call emergency services as a precaution: This is unnecessary without immediate danger (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 4.3), overstepping the situation described.
B. Consult with a therapist to discuss the client’s behavior: This breaches confidentiality without client consent (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 4) and exceeds the coach’s role.
C. Share the concerns with the client’s closest family member: This also breaches confidentiality unless harm is imminent (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 4.3), making it incorrect here.
D. Recommend that the client end coaching to focus on their mental health: Ending coaching isn’t required; the coach can continue within scope while referring out (ICF Definition of Coaching).
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit