Pass the Esri ArcGIS Enterprise EGMP2201 Questions and answers with ValidTests

Scenario Overview:

The organization hasArcGIS Enterpriseand requires versioned editing.

The project mandates tracking which user deleted a feature from thedefault version.

Why Branch Versioned Editing?

Branch versioningsupports versioned editing workflows and integrates seamlessly witheditor tracking, including operations like tracking who deleted a feature.

It is ideal for web-based workflows inArcGIS Enterpriseand allows for direct interaction with feature services.

The default version remains accessible for analysis while enabling the organization to track user edits, including feature deletions.(ArcGIS Documentation: Branch Versioning)

Alternative Options:

Option B: Traditional versioned editingsupports versioned workflows but does not inherently track who deletes features unless additional workflows are implemented (e.g., custom fields or triggers).

Option C: Nonversioned editingdoes not support versioning workflows or user tracking.

Thus,branch versioned editingis the best workflow to support versioned editing while tracking deleted features.

To facilitate collaboration between two teams of GIS analysts located in different offices, each requiring a copy of the data in their own enterprise geodatabase with the ability to edit the same feature classes and synchronize changes nightly, geodatabase replication is the appropriate solution.

Understanding Geodatabase Replication:

Geodatabase replication is a data distribution method in ArcGIS that allows you to create copies of data across two or more geodatabases. This enables multiple users to work with the same datasets in different locations, with the ability to synchronize changes to ensure consistency.

ARCGIS PRO

Types of Geodatabase Replication:

There are three types of geodatabase replication:

One-Way Replication: Changes are sent in a single direction—from the parent to the child replica.

Two-Way Replication: Changes are synchronized in both directions between the parent and child replicas. This is suitable when multiple editors need to update the same datasets in different locations.

Checkout/Check-in Replication: Data is checked out to a child replica for editing and then checked back in to the parent replica.

In this scenario, two-way replication is ideal, as it allows both teams to edit the same feature classes and synchronize changes nightly, ensuring that both geodatabases remain consistent.

ARCGIS PRO

Alternative Options:

Database Replication: This refers to replicating entire databases at the DBMS level. While it can synchronize data, it doesn't account for the geodatabase-specific behaviors, rules, and relationships managed by ArcGIS. Therefore, it may not be suitable for scenarios requiring synchronization of geodatabase-specific functionalities.

Distributed Collaboration: This is a framework in ArcGIS Enterprise that allows sharing of content, such as maps, layers, and apps, across multiple ArcGIS Enterprise deployments or between ArcGIS Enterpriseand ArcGIS Online. However, it doesn't provide the fine-grained control over data editing and synchronization required in this scenario.

GEODATABASE RESOURCES

Therefore, to meet the requirements of both teams being able to edit the same feature classes in their respective enterprise geodatabases and synchronize changes nightly, geodatabase replication is the most appropriate solution.

To allow editors to see changes made to the default version in their child versions without reconciling, the dataset must be registered astraditional versioned with the option to move edits to base.

1. How This Versioning Method Works

When registering data astraditional versioned with the option to move edits to base, changes made in the default version are immediately visible to all child versions without requiring reconciliation.

This method directly updates the base table for default version edits, bypassing the delta tables used in standard traditional versioning workflows.

2. Why Use This Method?

Immediate Visibility: Editors can see default version updates in their child versions without the need for reconciliation or posting.

Simplified Workflow: Reduces the overhead of managing version reconciliation and posting for users who only need to view updates.

3. Why Not Other Options?

Branch Versioned with Global IDs and Editor Tracking Enabled:

Branch versioning is designed for feature services and web-based editing workflows. It does not allow direct visibility of default version changes in child versions.

Traditional Versioned with Archiving and Editor Tracking Enabled:

This method tracks historical changes but does not allow child versions to see updates in the default version without reconciliation.

Steps to Register Data with Move Edits to Base Option:

InArcGIS Pro, right-click the dataset or feature class and selectManage > Register as Versioned.

Check the option"Move edits to base"during registration.

Save the changes and verify that editors can view default version changes without reconciliation.

References from Esri Documentation and Learning Resources:

Traditional Versioning with Move Edits to Base

Versioning Options in Enterprise Geodatabases

Conclusion:

Registering the dataset astraditional versioned with the option to move edits to baseensures that editors can see changes made to the default version in their child versions without requiring reconciliation.

 Understanding the Scenario:

Records are being appended to a child version of a feature class registered as versioned.

Reconcile and post are taking longer than expected, suggesting complications during version synchronization.

 Key Considerations for Reconciliation Performance:

Conflicting Edits (Option A):Reconciliation time increases if there are many conflicts to resolve. However, the question does not mention concurrent edits in Default or other child versions, making conflicts less likely to be the main issue.

Updates in Default (Option B):If Default has been updated since the child version was created, the reconcile process must account for changes in Default. This can significantly increase processing time as it integrates the child version changes with the modifications in Default.

Compress Operation (Option C):The Compress operation removes redundant states in the geodatabase but does not directly affect reconciliation speed. The question does not indicate that the child version is excluded from compression or that compression is related to the delay.

 Steps to Improve Reconciliation Performance:

Minimize edits to Default during the child version's workflow.

Reconcile frequently to avoid large differences between Default and the child version.

Ensure that Compress operations are run regularly to optimize geodatabase state management.

 References:

Esri Documentation: Reconcile and Post.

Versioning Best Practices: Guidance on managing Default and child versions to minimize reconcile conflicts.

 Why the Correct Answer is B:The delay occurs because Default was updated after the child version was created. The reconciliation process must merge changes from Default with those in the child version, increasing processing time. Conflicts (A) are not mentioned, and compress operations (C) do not directly cause reconciliation delays.

 Understanding the Scenario:

The feature class cannot havearchiving enabled.

Archiving tracks changes over time and requires specific configurations in versioned datasets.

 Key Constraints for Enabling Archiving:

Archiving can only be enabled for feature classes registered asversioned without moving edits to base.

Versioned with move edits to base:This configuration directly edits the base table, bypassing the delta tables (adds and deletes) used in traditional versioning. Since archiving relies on delta tables to track changes, this configuration is incompatible with archiving.

Branch Versioned with Editor Tracking:Branch versioning supports editor tracking and web-based workflows but does not currently support archiving.

 Steps to Correct the Configuration:

Re-register the feature class asversioned without moving edits to base.

Enable archiving after re-registration.

 References:

Esri Documentation: Archiving Requirements.

Versioning and Archiving Compatibility: Best practices for configuring datasets for archiving.

 Why the Correct Answer is B:When a feature class is registered asversioned with move edits to base, it does not maintain delta tables, making it incompatible with archiving.

The issue arises becauseOne-way, parent to child replicationis being used. In this type of replication, changes from the parent replica (production server) overwrite the data in the child replica (consultant's server) during synchronization, regardless of edits made in the child replica.

1. One-way Replication Workflow

Parent to Child: Changes are pushed from the parent to the child. The child can make local edits, but these edits are not sent back to the parent, and they can be overwritten when synchronizing.

In this case, the consultant's edits are overwritten because the synchronization is unidirectional from the production server to the consultant's server.

2. Issue with Conflicting Edits

SinceOne-way, parent to childreplication does not support bi-directional synchronization or conflict detection, local changes in the child replica are not preserved if the parent replica pushes updates that conflict with them.

3. Why Not Other Options?

Checkout/check-in:

This replication type allows edits to be made in the checkout replica and reconciled back to the parent during check-in. This ensures that conflicting edits are addressed.

One-way, child to parent:

In this replication, edits flow from the child replica to the parent replica. The issue described does not align with this setup.

References from Esri Documentation and Learning Resources:

Geodatabase Replication—ArcGIS Pro Documentation

Understanding One-Way Replication

Conclusion:

The issue occurs becauseOne-way, parent to child replicationis being used, where edits made on the child replica are overwritten by updates from the parent replica during synchronization.

Comprehensive Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation with All Enterprise Geodata References:

AnEnterprise geodatabaseis the most appropriate choice for this scenario due to the following reasons:

1. Requirement to Store Data Locally on Organization's Servers

AnEnterprise geodatabaseallows organizations to store GIS data locally in their own database management systems (DBMS), such as PostgreSQL, SQL Server, or Oracle.

This meets the requirement of maintaining control over data storage and ensuring the data resides within the organization's infrastructure.

2. Editing GIS Data via Web Services

Enterprise geodatabases seamlessly integrate with ArcGIS Server, enabling data editing via web services.

Organizations can publish feature services to allow authorized users to edit GIS data in real-time or in a disconnected environment (via sync).

These services support advanced editing workflows, including versioning and conflict resolution.

3. Indexing Specific Business Fields for Performance

Enterprise geodatabases offer robust indexing options to enhance query and editing performance.

You can:

Create attribute indexeson fields that are frequently queried.

Usespatial indexesto improve the speed of spatial queries.

This level of customization helps meet the performance demands of specific business workflows.

4. Advantages Over Other Storage Options

File Geodatabase:

While it is suitable for smaller datasets and local storage, it does not support multi-user editing, integration with web services, or advanced indexing for business fields.

Hosted Relational Database:

This option is part of ArcGIS Online or ArcGIS Enterprise managed services and stores data in the cloud, which contradicts the requirement for local storage.

It also does not provide the same level of control or indexing capabilities as an enterprise geodatabase.

References from Esri Documentation and Learning Resources:

Enterprise Geodatabases—ArcGIS Pro Documentation

Configuring Indexes in Geodatabases

Publishing Feature Services for Editing

Conclusion:

AnEnterprise geodatabasenot only meets all the stated requirements (local storage, web service editing, and indexed fields for performance) but also provides additional scalability, security, and multi-user editing capabilities.

 Understanding the Scenario:

An enterprise geodatabase feature dataset is accidentally deleted.

The organization needs to recover the dataset to its original state.

 Available Technologies:

High Availability:High availability setups (e.g., failover systems) ensure continuous access to geodatabases during hardware or software failures. However, high availability does not restore accidentally deleted data.

Backup:A backup is a snapshot of the geodatabase taken at a specific point in time. It allows administrators to restore deleted datasets or recover from data loss scenarios.

Archiving:Archiving tracks historical edits in versioned geodatabases but does not provide recovery for accidentally deleted datasets.

 Steps to Recover the Dataset:

Identify the most recent backup of the enterprise geodatabase.

Restore the geodatabase or extract the specific feature dataset from the backup.

Verify the restored data and synchronize it with ongoing updates if necessary.

 References:

Esri Documentation: Backup and Restore.

Best Practices for Data Protection: Guidelines for implementing regular backups to prevent data loss.

 Why the Correct Answer is B:A backup is the most reliable solution for recovering an accidentally deleted feature dataset. High availability ensures uptime but does not address data recovery, and archiving tracks edits rather than preserving entire datasets.

When experiencing slow performance on a query of an indexed attribute in a large feature class within an enterprise geodatabase, and a SQL trace reveals that the attribute index is not being utilized despite the attribute values having a high degree of uniqueness and the delta tables containing few rows, the appropriate action is to rebuild the indexes.

Understanding Indexes in Enterprise Geodatabases:

Indexes are critical for enhancing query performance in databases. They allow the database management system (DBMS) to locate and retrieve data efficiently. Over time, as data is inserted, updated, or deleted, indexes can become fragmented or outdated, leading to suboptimal query performance.

ARCGIS PRO

Rebuilding Indexes:

The Rebuild Indexes tool in ArcGIS Pro is designed to rebuild existing attribute or spatial indexes in enterprise geodatabases. This process reorganizes the index structure, ensuring that the DBMS can effectively utilize the indexes during query execution.

ARCGIS PRO

Steps to Rebuild Indexes:

Access the Rebuild Indexes Tool:

In ArcGIS Pro, navigate to the Analysis tab and click on Tools.

In the Geoprocessing pane, search for and select the Rebuild Indexes tool.

Configure the Tool Parameters:

Input Database Connection: Specify the connection to your enterprise geodatabase.

Include System Tables: Decide whether to include system tables in the rebuild process. Including system tables can help maintain the overall health of the geodatabase but may increase processing time.

Execute the Tool:

Click Run to initiate the index rebuilding process. Monitor the progress and ensure the process completes without errors.

Alternative Options:

Compress Geodatabase: The Compress operation reduces the size of the geodatabase by removing redundant states and versions. While it can improve performance, it doesn't directly address index fragmentation.

Analyze Datasets: The Analyze Datasets tool updates database statistics, which helps the DBMS optimize query execution plans. However, if indexes are fragmented, analyzing datasets alone may not resolve performance issues.

Given the symptoms described—specifically, the attribute index not being used in queries—the most effective solution is to rebuild the indexes to ensure they are properly structured and utilized by the DBMS during query execution.

To track feature class changes while keeping thereconcile, post, and compress processesseparate from thereplica synchronization process, the best approach is tocreate a one-way replica using the archive option on Default.

1. Why Use a One-Way Replica on Default?

One-Way Replication:

Sends data changes from the parent (Default version) to the child geodatabase, ensuring that synchronization does not interfere with the parent geodatabase’s versioning operations.

Archive Option:

Archiving captures all changes to the feature class, providing a history of edits without requiring versioning in the replica.

2. Why Choose the Default Version?

Using the Default version as the parent ensures that all reconciled and posted changes are synchronized to the replica, making the synchronization independent of ongoing versioning workflows in the geodatabase.

3. Why Not Other Options?

Create a One-Way Replica Using the Archive Option on a Child Version of Default:

Replicating from a child version complicates workflows because the child version must be reconciled and posted to Default before updates are reflected in the replica.

Create a Two-Way Replica Using the Archive Option on Default:

Two-way replication synchronizes changes in both directions. This would integrate changes from the child geodatabase into Default, interfering with the reconciliation and posting processes.

Steps to Create the Replica:

Ensure archiving is enabled for the feature classes in the Default version.

Use theCreate Replicatool in ArcGIS Pro and selectOne-Way Replication.

Configure the replica to include the archive option.

Synchronize the replica as needed without affecting versioning processes in the parent geodatabase.

References from Esri Documentation and Learning Resources:

One-Way Replication Overview

Geodatabase Archiving

Conclusion:

To track changes while separating reconcile, post, and compress processes from synchronization, the GIS analyst shouldcreate a one-way replica using the archive option on Default.