Pass the Google Professional Chrome Enterprise Chrome-Enterprise-Administrator Questions and answers with ValidTests

To combat cookie theft from infostealer malware, requiring "Enhanced Safe Browsing" provides proactive protection against malicious websites and downloads that might distribute such malware. Enabling "Application Bound Encryption" adds an extra layer of security to cookies and other sensitive data stored by Chrome, making them harder for malware to use even if stolen. Blocking third-party cookies (option A) can improve privacy but doesn't directly prevent malware from stealing first-party session cookies. Invalidating existing cookies (option C) is a reactive measure and doesn't prevent future theft. Disallowing Chrome Sync and requiring Incognito mode (option D) changes user behavior but doesn't inherently protect against malware on the local machine.

===========

The most likely reason for this discrepancy is that the version reported in the Chrome Enterprise Core compliance report might not be updated in real-time until Chrome is actively running and checks in. When an engineer logs in and launches Chrome, it likely completes the update process and reports the correct version. The auto-update feature generally works in the background, and a completely different unmanaged version (option C) or a persistent network block (option D) would likely prevent updates even when Chrome is launched. A malfunctioning auto-update (option A) is less likely to resolve itself upon manual launch.

===========

The scenario describes vulnerabilities that could allow cross-site data leakage within the browser's memory. "Site isolation for every website" is a security feature in Chrome that isolates the rendering process for each website, preventing one site from accessing the data of another, even if a vulnerability is exploited. This policy directly addresses the risk of cross-site information leakage due to memory vulnerabilities. Option A relates to TLS security, option B is a general security best practice but doesn't directly prevent cross-site memory access, and option C manages extension behavior, not core browser memory isolation.

===========

When a managed browser is deleted from the Google Admin console, it needs to be re-enrolled to receive policies again. The process for re-enrollment typically involves deleting the **device management token** from the local machine. Upon relaunching Chrome, the browser will detect the absence of the token and attempt to re-enroll with the cloud management service, at which point it will receive a new token and the latest policies. Deleting the enrollment token (option B) might disrupt the initial enrollment if it still existed. Deleting Chrome policies (option C) might not trigger re-enrollment. Clearing the cache and signing back in (option D) addresses user profile data, not device enrollment.

===========

If an extension that is force-installed via policy is unpublished from the Chrome Web Store, the Chrome browser will detect this status and automatically disable the extension on managed devices. This is a security mechanism to prevent the continued use of potentially compromised or no longer maintained extensions.

===========

The study guide emphasizes using enrollment tokens generated in the Google Admin console for enrolling browsers. When using an MDM solution, the most efficient and recommended method is to generate a single enrollment token and then deploy it to the devices through the MDM software. This allows for automated and scalable enrollment. Bulk enrollment features in the Admin console are typically for direct enrollment, not through MDM. Individual tokens or keys would be inefficient for a large deployment.

===========

To target all updates within the 129 major version, the administrator should use the target version prefix `129.`. This tells Chrome to stay within the 129 branch and accept minor updates (like 129.0.x.y to 129.1.x.y) but not to upgrade to the next major version (130). The other options are not the correct syntax for specifying a major version prefix for target updates.

===========

When Chrome's Safe Browsing feature identifies a website as potentially risky and displays a warning page that the user might bypass to visit the site, this interaction is typically logged in the Audit and Investigation Report as a "Site Warning Unsafe Site Visit" event. This allows administrators to track instances where users might be exposed to potentially malicious content despite browser warnings. SSL errors relate to certificate issues, untrusted site visit is a more general term, and site isolation violation refers to a different security mechanism.

===========

Among the Safe Browsing options, **Enhanced Protection** offers the most robust security. It proactively checks URLs, downloads, and extensions against Google's Safe Browsing database in real time, and it can also share more data with Google to improve detection and provide personalized warnings. This level of protection is best suited for environments with high security requirements. The other options might represent different levels of Safe Browsing with varying degrees of protection.

===========

The most granular and appropriate approach to apply work-related policies without affecting personal browsing is to use **managed profiles**. By requiring users to use a specific managed profile for work purposes, administrators can enforce policies only within that profile. Personal browsing in a separate, unmanaged profile will remain unaffected. Option A would apply policies to all browsing, which is not the requirement. Option C relies on bookmarks, which is not a security enforcement mechanism. Option D is generally not feasible as enterprise policies are designed to be enforced, and setting reliable exceptions for personal use within a managed browser is complex and less secure than using separate profiles.

===========