Pass the Real Estate Massachusetts Real Estate Massachusetts-Real-Estate-Salesperson Questions and answers with ValidTests

Tenancy by the entirety is a special form of ownership available only to married couples in Massachusetts. It provides rights of survivorship and protection from individual creditors of one spouse.

Upon divorce, the law automatically converts a tenancy by the entirety into a tenancy in common, unless otherwise stated in the divorce decree. In tenancy in common, each former spouse owns an undivided share of the property without survivorship rights, and they are free to transfer or sell their interest independently.

It does not convert into joint tenancy or tenancy in severalty unless agreed to or ordered by the court.

The correct answer is B, Massachusetts intestate succession law. When a person dies without a valid will, property that forms part of the probate estate is distributed according to the Massachusetts Uniform Probate Code rather than according to a broker ' s judgment or informal family preference.

Massachusetts law establishes an order of succession for heirs other than a surviving spouse. Depending on who survives the decedent, the estate may pass to descendants, parents, descendants of parents, or other next of kin according to statutory rules.

A surviving spouse ' s share is governed by separate provisions and depends on family circumstances.

Candidates must also remember that not all property passes through probate. Property held in joint tenancy or tenancy by the entirety with a right of survivorship can pass directly to the surviving co-owner by operation of law. Massachusetts probate guidance expressly identifies survivorship property as property that may fall outside the probate estate.

The older phrase “statute of descent and distribution” describes the same general concept, but intestate succession is the clearer current terminology.

Study Guide Reference: Transfer of Title — Intestate Succession, Probate, Heirs and Survivorship.

The correct answer is A. Massachusetts clearly distinguishes the authority of a broker from that of a salesperson.

The Board ' s consumer guidance states that a salesperson must be affiliated with a broker and work under that broker ' s supervision. The salesperson cannot independently operate a real-estate business and has no authority or control over brokerage escrow funds.

Massachusetts licensing curriculum likewise states that a salesperson cannot be self-employed, may affiliate with only one broker at a time, cannot receive valuable consideration from anyone other than the broker, and may not complete the transaction independently.

A salesperson can perform substantial transaction activities—showing property, working with buyers and sellers, advertising listings, and participating in negotiation—but those activities occur within the responsible broker ' s brokerage structure.

This broker-supervision requirement is one of the most important Massachusetts-specific distinctions tested on the state portion of the examination.

Study Guide Reference: Massachusetts License Law — Salesperson Authority, Broker Affiliation and Supervision.

Massachusetts law (M.G.L. c. 151B, § 4) prohibits discrimination in housing based on receipt of public assistance, such as Section 8 housing vouchers or other government aid. If a seller instructs a broker not to show a property to prospective buyers or renters receiving government assistance, the broker cannot legally comply with that request.

The broker’s fiduciary duty to the client does not extend to violating fair housing law. In such cases, the broker must refuse the listing because accepting it would require them to engage in unlawful discriminatory practices. Reporting to the Board or MCAD is not required; the appropriate action is simply to refuse participation in illegal activity.

This aligns with the Massachusetts Real Estate Licensing Law and MCAD enforcement rules, which hold licensees personally responsible for discriminatory conduct in real estate transactions.

In Massachusetts, tenancies at will are legally enforceable and governed by M.G.L. c. 186, § 12. This type of tenancy exists without a fixed lease term and continues until terminated by proper notice (30 days or one full rental period, whichever is longer).

Other options are incorrect:

Security deposits (M.G.L. c. 186, § 15B) accrue interest from the date received, not after one year.

Leases do not terminate when property is sold; the new owner assumes the landlord’s obligations under the lease.

Death of the landlord does not terminate a lease; the landlord’s estate or heirs become the landlord under Massachusetts law.

Therefore, the correct statement is that tenancies at will are enforceable under the law.

The Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) is the state agency responsible for enforcing the Massachusetts Fair Housing Law (M.G.L. c. 151B). Blockbusting is the illegal practice of inducing homeowners to sell by suggesting that protected classes of people (such as minorities, families with children, or people receiving public assistance) are moving into the neighborhood, often suggesting declining property values.

This practice is explicitly prohibited under both federal law (Fair Housing Act) and Massachusetts General Law. MCAD has the authority to investigate complaints of housing discrimination and levy fines against licensees found guilty of such violations.

While misrepresentation or undisclosed dual capacity may lead to disciplinary action by the Massachusetts Board of Registration of Real Estate Brokers and Salespersons, only violations of fair housing law, such as blockbusting, steering, or refusing to deal with members of protected classes, fall under the jurisdiction of MCAD.

In Massachusetts, licensee relationship disclosure is governed by M.G.L. c. 112, § 87AAA and 254 CMR 3.00. State law requires that real estate agents disclose their agency relationship to prospective buyers and sellers at the first personal meeting to discuss a specific property. This requirement is primarily intended for residential transactions involving one- to four-family properties.

This disclosure clarifies whether the agent represents the seller, the buyer, or is functioning in another capacity (such as a facilitator). It ensures that consumers are fully informed about where the licensee’s loyalty lies before substantive discussions occur.

The law does not require agency disclosure for mere inquiries (phone or internet), for general real estate discussions, or for commercial property listings. The specific trigger is the first personal meeting to discuss a specific single-family property.

The correct Massachusetts answer is D. This is an important correction to the older source-bank question.

Massachusetts Board foreclosure curriculum expressly states that Massachusetts has no statutory right of redemption after a mortgage foreclosure. Instead, the borrower has an equitable right of redemption before completion of the foreclosure sale—described in the curriculum as existing until the auctioneer ' s hammer comes down.

Candidates must not confuse mortgage foreclosure with municipal tax-title redemption. Massachusetts tax-title law follows a different statutory framework and allows property owners to redeem tax-taken or tax-sold property until the right of redemption is legally foreclosed by the Land Court.

Thus, the original generic practice question claiming that a Massachusetts mortgage borrower can simply pay the debt after the foreclosure sale under a statutory right of redemption is wrong.

Study Guide Reference: Financing — Massachusetts Foreclosure; Equitable Right of Redemption versus Tax-Title Redemption.

The correct answer is B, Adverse possession. Massachusetts generally requires 20 years of qualifying adverse possession. The claimant must establish possession that is actual, open and notorious, exclusive, adverse or hostile to the true owner ' s rights, and continuous for the statutory period.

The doctrine exists because an owner who allows another person to occupy and treat land as their own openly and continuously for the required period can eventually lose the right to recover possession. Mere occasional trespassing is insufficient. Likewise, use made with the owner ' s permission is generally not hostile and therefore will not mature into adverse possession.

Massachusetts also has important exceptions. Most notably, registered land cannot be acquired by adverse possession under M.G.L. c.185 §53, and certain Commonwealth or protected public lands are also immune.

Thus, if the farmer ' s conduct satisfies every required element for the full 20 years and the land is legally susceptible to adverse possession, a court can recognize title in the farmer.

Study Guide Reference: Property Ownership — Adverse Possession; M.G.L. c.260 §21.

B is correct. A Massachusetts tax taking or tax sale does not ordinarily extinguish the owner ' s right of redemption immediately. The tax title remains subject to the owner ' s statutory right to redeem until that right is properly foreclosed. Redemption generally requires payment of the amounts legally due, which can include unpaid taxes, interest, and applicable costs or charges.

Massachusetts current guidance expressly states that an owner may recover the property by paying what is owed before the Land Court enters a final judgment foreclosing the right of redemption. Therefore, someone who obtains the necessary funds only one week after the tax taking is still far earlier than the normal foreclosure endpoint.

Candidates should be cautious with older preparation materials stating that Massachusetts owners simply have a fixed “six-month redemption period.” Current law was amended, and for tax titles entered on or after November 1, 2024 the statutory waiting period before filing certain foreclosure petitions generally became 12 months. More importantly, that waiting period is not the same thing as automatic expiration of redemption.

Study Guide Reference: Property Ownership/Transfer of Title — tax liens, tax title and right of redemption; M.G.L. c.60.