Pass the Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Professional DOP-C02 Questions and answers with ValidTests

Exam DOP-C02 Premium Access

View all detail and faqs for the DOP-C02 exam

Go to Exam

Viewing page 12 out of 13 pages

Viewing questions 111-120 out of questions

Questions # 111:

A company has configured an Amazon S3 event source on an AWS Lambda function The company needs the Lambda function to run when a new object is created or an existing object IS modified In a particular S3 bucket The Lambda function will use the S3 bucket name and the S3 object key of the incoming event to read the contents of the created or modified S3 object The Lambda function will parse the contents and save the parsed contents to an Amazon DynamoDB table.

The Lambda function's execution role has permissions to read from the S3 bucket and to write to the DynamoDB table, During testing, a DevOps engineer discovers that the Lambda

function does not run when objects are added to the S3 bucket or when existing objects are modified.

Which solution will resolve this problem?

Options:

Increase the memory of the Lambda function to give the function the ability to process large files from the S3 bucket.

Create a resource policy on the Lambda function to grant Amazon S3 the permission to invoke the Lambda function for the S3 bucket

Configure an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue as an OnFailure destination for the Lambda function

Provision space in the /tmp folder of the Lambda function to give the function the ability to process large files from the S3 bucket

Answer

Explanation

Option A is incorrect because increasing the memory of the Lambda function does not address the root cause of the problem, which is that the Lambda function is not triggered by the S3 event source. Increasing the memory of the Lambda function might improve its performance or reduce its execution time, but it does not affect its invocation. Moreover, increasing the memory of the Lambda function might incur higher costs, as Lambda charges based on the amount of memory allocated to the function.

Option B is correct because creating a resource policy on the Lambda function to grant Amazon S3 the permission to invoke the Lambda function for the S3 bucket is a necessary step to configure an S3 event source. A resource policy is a JSON document that defines who can access a Lambda resource and under what conditions. By granting Amazon S3 permission to invoke the Lambda function, the company ensures that the Lambda function runs when a new object is created or an existing object is modified in the S3 bucket1.

Option C is incorrect because configuring an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue as an On-Failure destination for the Lambda function does not help with triggering the Lambda function. An On-Failure destination is a feature that allows Lambda to send events to another service, such as SQS or Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS), when a function invocation fails. However, this feature only applies to asynchronous invocations, and S3 event sources use synchronous invocations. Therefore, configuring an SQS queue as an On-Failure destination would have no effect on the problem.

Option D is incorrect because provisioning space in the /tmp folder of the Lambda function does not address the root cause of the problem, which is that the Lambda function is not triggered by the S3 event source. Provisioning space in the /tmp folder of the Lambda function might help with processing large files from the S3 bucket, as it provides temporary storage for up to 512 MB of data. However, it does not affect the invocation of the Lambda function.

[References:, Using AWS Lambda with Amazon S3, Lambda resource access permissions, AWS Lambda destinations, [AWS Lambda file system], , , ]

Questions # 112:

A company's DevOps engineer is creating an AWS Lambda function to process notifications from an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic. The Lambda function will process the notification messages and will write the contents of the notification messages to an Amazon RDS Multi-AZ DB instance.

During testing a database administrator accidentally shut down the DB instance. While the database was down the company lost several of the SNS notification messages that were delivered during that time.

The DevOps engineer needs to prevent the loss of notification messages in the future

Which solutions will meet this requirement? (Select TWO.)

Options:

Replace the RDS Multi-AZ DB instance with an Amazon DynamoDB table.

Configure an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue as a destination of the Lambda function.

Configure an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS> dead-letter queue for the SNS topic.

Subscribe an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue to the SNS topic Configure the Lambda function to process messages from the SQS queue.

Replace the SNS topic with an Amazon EventBridge event bus Configure an EventBridge rule on the new event bus to invoke the Lambda function for each event.

Questions # 113:

A company uses an organization in AWS Organizations to manage multiple AWS accounts The company needs an automated process across all AWS accounts to isolate any compromised Amazon EC2 instances when the instances receive a specific tag.

Which combination of steps will meet these requirements? (Select TWO.)

Options:

Use AWS Cloud Formation StackSets to deploy the Cloud Formation stacks in all AWS accounts.

Create an SCP that has a Deny statement for the ec2:" action with a condition of "aws:RequestTag/isolation": false.

Attach the SCP to the root of the organization.

Create an AWS Cloud Formation template that creates an EC2 instance rote that has no 1AM policies attached. Configure the template to have a security group that has an explicit Deny rule on all traffic. Use the Cloud Formation template to create an AWS Lambda function that attaches the 1AM role to instances. Configure the Lambda function to add a network ACL. Sot up an Amazon EventBridge rule to invoke the Lambda function when a specific ta

Create an AWS Cloud Formation template that creates an EC2 instance role that has no 1AM policies attached. Configure the template to have a security group that has no inbound rules or outbound rules. Use the CloudFormation template to create an AWS Lambda function that attaches the 1AM role to instances. Configure the Lambda function to replace any existing security groups with the new security group. Set up an Amazon EventBridge rule to i

Answer

A, E

Explanation

 Step 1: Deploy the Automation Solution using CloudFormation StackSets

To automate the process across multiple AWS accounts within an organization, you can use AWS CloudFormation StackSets. StackSets allow you to deploy CloudFormation templates to multiple accounts within an organization, ensuring consistent infrastructure and automation.

Action: Use AWS CloudFormation StackSets to deploy the necessary resources across all AWS accounts. This includes deploying the Lambda function and security groups that will isolate compromised EC2 instances.

Why: StackSets make it easy to deploy and manage resources across multiple AWS accounts, reducing the operational overhead.

[Reference: AWS documentation on CloudFormation StackSets., This corresponds to Option A: Use AWS CloudFormation StackSets to deploy the CloudFormation stacks in all AWS accounts.,  Step 2: Isolate EC2 Instances using Lambda and Security GroupsWhen an EC2 instance is compromised, it needs to be isolated from the network. This can be done by creating a security group with no inbound or outbound rules and attaching it to the instance. A Lambda function can handle this process and can be triggered automatically by an Amazon EventBridge rule when a specific tag (e.g., "isolation") is applied to the compromised instance., Action: Create a Lambda function that attaches an isolated security group (with no inbound or outbound rules) to the compromised EC2 instances. Set up an EventBridge rule to trigger the Lambda function when the "isolation" tag is applied to the instance., Why: This automates the isolation process, ensuring that any compromised instances are immediately cut off from the network, reducing the potential damage from the compromise., Reference: AWS documentation on Tag-based Event Handling., This corresponds to Option E: Create an AWS CloudFormation template that creates an EC2 instance role that has no IAM policies attached. Configure the template to have a security group that has no inbound rules or outbound rules. Use the CloudFormation template to create an AWS Lambda function that attaches the IAM role to instances. Configure the Lambda function to replace any existing security groups with the new security group. Set up an Amazon EventBridge rule to invoke the Lambda function when a specific tag is applied to a compromised EC2 instance., , , ]

Questions # 114:

A company has an organization in AWS Organizations for its multi-account environment. A DevOps engineer is developing an AWS CodeArtifact based strategy for application package management across the organization. Each application team at the company has its own account in the organization. Each application team also has limited access to a centralized shared services account.

Each application team needs full access to download, publish, and grant access to its own packages. Some common library packages that the application teams use must also be shared with the entire organization.

Which combination of steps will meet these requirements with the LEAST administrative overhead? (Select THREE.)

Options:

Create a domain in each application team's account. Grant each application team's account lull read access and write access to the application team's domain

Create a domain in the shared services account Grant the organization read access and CreateRepository access.

Create a repository in each application team's account. Grant each application team's account lull read access and write access to its own repository.

Create a repository in the shared services account. Grant the organization read access to the repository in the shared services account. Set the repository as the upstream repository in each application team's repository.

For teams that require shared packages, create resource-based policies that allow read access to the repository from other application teams' accounts.

Set the other application teams' repositories as upstream repositories.

Answer

B, D, E

Explanation

 Step 1: Creating a Centralized Domain in the Shared Services Account

To manage application package dependencies across multiple accounts, the most efficient solution is to create a centralized domain in the shared services account. This allows all application teams to access and manage package repositories within the same domain, ensuring consistency and centralization.

Action: Create a domain in the shared services account.

Why: A single, centralized domain reduces the need for redundant management in each application team's account.

[Reference: AWS documentation on AWS CodeArtifact domains and repositories., This corresponds to Option B: Create a domain in the shared services account. Grant the organization read access and CreateRepository access.,  Step 2: Sharing Repositories Across Teams with Upstream ConfigurationsTo share common library packages across the organization, each application team's repository can point to the shared services repository as an upstream repository. This enables teams to access shared packages without managing them individually in each team's account., Action: Create a repository in the shared services account and set it as the upstream repository for each application team., Why: Upstream repositories allow package sharing while maintaining individual team repositories for managing their own packages., Reference: AWS documentation on Upstream repositories in CodeArtifact., This corresponds to Option D: Create a repository in the shared services account. Grant the organization read access to the repository in the shared services account. Set the repository as the upstream repository in each application team's repository.,  Step 3: Using Resource-Based Policies for Cross-Account AccessFor teams that need to share their packages with other application teams, resource-based policies can be applied to grant the necessary permissions. These policies allow cross-account access without having to manage permissions at the individual account level., Action: Create resource-based policies that allow read access to the repositories across application teams., Why: This simplifies management by centralizing permissions in the shared services account while allowing cross-team collaboration., Reference: AWS documentation on CodeArtifact resource-based policies., This corresponds to Option E: For teams that require shared packages, create resource-based policies that allow read access to the repository from other application teams' accounts., , , , ]

Questions # 115:

A company has a data ingestion application that runs across multiple AWS accounts. The accounts are in an organization in AWS Organizations. The company needs to monitor the application and consolidate access to the application. Currently the company is running the application on Amazon EC2 instances from several Auto Scaling groups. The EC2 instances have no access to the internet because the data is sensitive Engineers have deployed the necessary VPC endpoints. The EC2 instances run a custom AMI that is built specifically tor the application.

To maintain and troubleshoot the application, system administrators need the ability to log in to the EC2 instances. This access must be automated and controlled centrally. The company's security team must receive a notification whenever the instances are accessed.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Options:

Create an Amazon EventBridge rule to send notifications to the security team whenever a user logs in to an EC2 instance Use EC2 Instance Connect to log in to the instances. Deploy Auto Scaling groups by using AWS Cloud Formation Use the cfn-init helper script to deploy appropriate VPC routes for external access Rebuild the custom AMI so that the custom AMI includes AWS Systems Manager Agent.

Deploy a NAT gateway and a bastion host that has internet access Create a security group that allows incoming traffic on all the EC2 instances from the bastion host Install AWS Systems Manager Agent on all the EC2 instances Use Auto Scaling group lifecycle hooks for monitoring and auditing access Use Systems Manager Session Manager to log in to the instances Send logs to a log group m Amazon CloudWatch Logs. Export data to Amazon S3 for aud

Use EC2 Image Builder to rebuild the custom AMI Include the most recent version of AWS Systems Manager Agent in the Image Configure the Auto Scaling group to attach the AmazonSSMManagedinstanceCore role to all the EC2 instances Use Systems Manager Session Manager to log in to the instances Enable logging of session details to Amazon S3 Create an S3 event notification for new file uploads to send a message to the security team through an Ama

Use AWS Systems Manager Automation to build Systems Manager Agent into the custom AMI Configure AWS Configure to attach an SCP to the root organization account to allow the EC2 instances to connect to Systems Manager Use Systems Manager Session Manager to log in to the instances Enable logging of session details to Amazon S3 Create an S3 event notification for new file uploads to send a message to the security team through an Amazon Simple

Questions # 116:

An IT team has built an AWS CloudFormation template so others in the company can quickly and reliably deploy and terminate an application. The template creates an Amazon EC2 instance with a user data script to install the application and an Amazon S3 bucket that the application uses to serve static webpages while it is running.

All resources should be removed when the CloudFormation stack is deleted. However, the team observes that CloudFormation reports an error during stack deletion, and the S3 bucket created by the stack is not deleted.

How can the team resolve the error in the MOST efficient manner to ensure that all resources are deleted without errors?

Options:

Add a DelelionPolicy attribute to the S3 bucket resource, with the value Delete forcing the bucket to be removed when the stack is deleted.

Add a custom resource with an AWS Lambda function with the DependsOn attribute specifying the S3 bucket, and an IAM role. Write the Lambda function to delete all objects from the bucket when RequestType is Delete.

Identify the resource that was not deleted. Manually empty the S3 bucket and then delete it.

Replace the EC2 and S3 bucket resources with a single AWS OpsWorks Stacks resource. Define a custom recipe for the stack to create and delete the EC2 instance and the S3 bucket.

Questions # 117:

A company's organization in AWS Organizations has a single OU. The company runs Amazon EC2 instances in the OU accounts. The company needs to limit the use of each EC2 instance's credentials to the specific EC2 instance that the credential is assigned to. A DevOps engineer must configure security for the EC2 instances.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Options:

Create an SCP that specifies the VPC CIDR block. Configure the SCP to check whether the value of the aws:VpcSourcelp condition key is in the specified block. In the same SCP check, check whether the values of the aws:EC2lnstanceSourcePrivatelPv4 and aws:SourceVpc condition keys are the same. Deny access if either condition is false. Apply the SCP to the OU.

Create an SCP that checks whether the values of the aws:EC2lnstanceSourceVPC and aws:SourceVpc condition keys are the same. Deny access if the values are not the same. In the same SCP check, check whether the values of the aws:EC2lnstanceSourcePrivatelPv4 and awsVpcSourcelp condition keys are the same. Deny access if the values are not the same. Apply the SCP to the OU.

Create an SCP that includes a list of acceptable VPC values and checks whether the value of the aws:SourceVpc condition key is in the list. In the same SCP check, define a list of acceptable IP address values and check whether the value of the aws:VpcSourcelp condition key is in the list. Deny access if either condition is false. Apply the SCP to each account in the organization.

Create an SCP that checks whether the values of the aws:EC2lnstanceSourceVPC and aws:VpcSourcelp condition keys are the same. Deny access if the values are not the same. In the same SCP check, check whether the values of the aws:EC2lnstanceSourcePrivatolPv4 and aws:SourceVpc condition keys are the same. Deny access if the values are not the same. Apply the SCP to each account in the organization.

Questions # 118:

A DevOps engineer needs to implement integration tests into an existing AWS CodePipelme CI/CD workflow for an Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) service. The CI/CD workflow retrieves new application code from an AWS CodeCommit repository and builds a container image. The CI/CD workflow then uploads the container image to Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR) with a new image tag version.

The integration tests must ensure that new versions of the service endpoint are reachable and that vanous API methods return successful response data The DevOps engineer has already created an ECS cluster to test the service

Which combination of steps will meet these requirements with the LEAST management overhead? (Select THREE.)

Options:

Add a deploy stage to the pipeline Configure Amazon ECS as the action provider

Add a deploy stage to the pipeline Configure AWS CodeDeploy as the action provider

Add an appspec.yml file to the CodeCommit repository

Update the image build pipeline stage to output an imagedefinitions json file that references the new image tag.

Create an AWS Lambda function that runs connectivity checks and API calls against the service. Integrate the Lambda function with CodePipeline by using aLambda action stage

Write a script that runs integration tests against the service. Upload the script to an Amazon S3 bucket. Integrate the script in the S3 bucket with CodePipeline by using an S3 action stage.

Answer

A, D, E

Explanation

 Add a Deploy Stage to the Pipeline, Configure Amazon ECS as the Action Provider:

By adding a deploy stage to the pipeline and configuring Amazon ECS as the action provider, the pipeline can automatically deploy the new container image to the ECS cluster.

This ensures that the service is updated with the new image tag, making the new version of the service endpoint reachable.

[Reference: AWS CodePipeline with ECS,  Update the Image Build Pipeline Stage to Output an imagedefinitions.json File that References the New Image Tag:, The imagedefinitions.json file provides the necessary information about the container images and their tags for the ECS task definitions., Updating the pipeline to output this file ensures that the correct image version is deployed., Example imagedefinitions.json, , [, {, "name": "container-name",, "imageUri": "123456789012.dkr.ecr.region.amazonaws.com/my-repo:my-tag", }, ], , ,  Reference: CodePipeline ECS Deployment,  Create an AWS Lambda Function that Runs Connectivity Checks and API Calls against the Service. Integrate the Lambda Function with CodePipeline by Using a Lambda Action Stage:, The Lambda function can perform the necessary integration tests by making connectivity checks and API calls to the deployed service endpoint., Integrating this Lambda function into CodePipeline ensures that these tests are run automatically after deployment, providing near-real-time feedback on the new deployment’s health., , Example Lambda function integration:, actions:, - name: TestService, actionTypeId:, category: Test, owner: AWS, provider: Lambda, version: 1, runOrder: 2, configuration:, FunctionName: testServiceFunction, , Reference: Integrating Lambda with CodePipeline, These steps ensure that the CI/CD workflow deploys the new container image to ECS, updates the image references, and performs integration tests, meeting the requirements with minimal management overhead., , , , ]

Questions # 119:

A company manages a web application that runs on Amazon EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB). The EC2 instances run in an Auto Scaling group across multiple Availability Zones. The application uses an Amazon RDS for MySQL DB instance to store the data. The company has configured Amazon Route 53 with an alias record that points to the ALB.

A new company guideline requires a geographically isolated disaster recovery (DR> site with an RTO of 4 hours and an RPO of 15 minutes.

Which DR strategy will meet these requirements with the LEAST change to the application stack?

Options:

Launch a replica environment of everything except Amazon RDS in a different Availability Zone Create an RDS read replica in the new Availability Zone: and configure the new stack to point to the local RDS DB instance. Add the new stack to the Route 53 record set by using a hearth check to configure a failover routing policy.

Launch a replica environment of everything except Amazon RDS in a different AWS. Region Create an RDS read replica in the new Region and configure the new stack to point to the local RDS DB instance. Add the new stack to the Route 53 record set by using a health check to configure a latency routing policy.

Launch a replica environment of everything except Amazon RDS ma different AWS Region. In the event of an outage copy and restore the latest RDS snapshot from the primary. Region to the DR Region Adjust the Route 53 record set to point to the ALB in the DR Region.

Launch a replica environment of everything except Amazon RDS in a different AWS Region. Create an RDS read replica in the new Region and configure the new environment to point to the local RDS DB instance. Add the new stack to the Route 53 record set by using a health check to configure a failover routing policy. In the event of an outage promote the read replica to primary.

Questions # 120:

A company is migrating from its on-premises data center to AWS. The company currently uses a custom on-premises CI/CD pipeline solution to build and package software.

The company wants its software packages and dependent public repositories to be available in AWS CodeArtifact to facilitate the creation of application-specific pipelines.

Which combination of steps should the company take to update the CI/CD pipeline solution and to configure CodeArtifact with the LEAST operational overhead? (Select TWO.)

Options:

Update the CI/CD pipeline to create a VM image that contains newly packaged software Use AWS Import/Export to make the VM image available as anAmazon EC2 AMI. Launch the AMI with an attached 1AM instance profile that allows CodeArtifact actions. Use AWS CLI commands to publish the packages to a CodeArtifact repository.

Create an AWS Identity and Access Management Roles Anywhere trust anchor Create an 1AM role that allows CodeArtifact actions and that has a trust relationship on the trust anchor. Update the on-premises CI/CD pipeline to assume the new 1AM role and to publish the packages to CodeArtifact.

Create a new Amazon S3 bucket. Generate a presigned URL that allows the PutObject request. Update the on-premises CI/CD pipeline to use thepresigned URL to publish the packages from the on-premises location to the S3 bucket. Create an AWS Lambda function that runs when packages are created in the bucket through a put command Configure the Lambda function to publish the packages to CodeArtifact

For each public repository, create a CodeArtifact repository that is configured with an external connection Configure the dependent repositories as upstream public repositories.

Create a CodeArtifact repository that is configured with a set of external connections to the public repositories. Configure the external connections to be downstream of the repository

Viewing page 12 out of 13 pages

Viewing questions 111-120 out of questions

Pre-Summer Special Limited Time 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: validbest

Pass the Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Professional DOP-C02 Questions and answers with ValidTests

Exam DOP-C02 Premium Access

Options:

Options:

Options:

Options:

Options:

Options:

Options:

Options:

Options:

Options: