Pass the Amazon Web Services AWS Solutions Architect Associate SAA-C03 Questions and answers with ValidTests

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/Aurora.Replication.html

#Aurora.Replication.Replicas Aurora Replicas have two main purposes. You can issue queries to them to scale the read operations for your application. You typically do so by connecting to the reader endpoint of the cluster. That way, Aurora can spread the load for read-only connections across as many Aurora Replicas as you have in the cluster. Aurora Replicas also help to increase availability. If the writer instance in a cluster becomes unavailable, Aurora automatically promotes one of the reader instances to take its place as the new writer.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/Aurora.Overview.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-ecs-taskdefinition.html

Cloudfront for rapid response and s3 to minimize infrastructure.

This solution meets the requirements of a two-tier application that has a variable demand based on the time of day and must be available at all times, while minimizing the overall cost. EC2 Reserved Instances can provide significant savings compared to On-Demand Instances for the baseline level of usage, and they can guarantee capacity reservation when needed. EC2 Spot Instances can provide up to 90% savings compared to On-Demand Instances for any additional capacity that the application needs during peak hours. Spot Instances are suitable for stateless applications that can tolerate interruptions and can be replaced by other instances. Stopping the RDS database when it is not in use can reduce the cost of running the database tier.

Option A is incorrect because using all EC2 Spot Instances can affect the availability of the application if there are not enough spare capacity or if the Spot price exceeds the maximum price. Stopping the RDS database when it is not in use can reduce the cost of running the database tier, but it can also affect the availability of the application. Option B is incorrect because purchasing EC2 Instance Savings Plans to cover five EC2 instances can lock in a fixed amount of compute usage per hour, which may not match the actual usage pattern of the application. Purchasing an RDS Reserved DB Instance can provide savings for the database tier, but it does not allow stopping the database when it is not in use. Option D is incorrect becausepurchasing EC2 Instance Savings Plans to cover two EC2 instances can lock in a fixed amount of compute usage per hour, which may not match the actual usage pattern of the application. Using up to three additional EC2 On-Demand Instances as needed can incur higher costs than using Spot Instances.

To make all the data available to various teams and minimize operational overhead, the company can create a data lake by using AWS Lake Formation. This will allow the company to centralize all the data in one place and use fine-grained access controls to manage access to the data. To meet the requirements of the company, the solutions architect can create a data lake by using AWS Lake Formation, create an AWS Glue JDBC connection to Amazon RDS, and register the S3 bucket in Lake Formation. The solutions architect can then use Lake Formation access controls to limit access to the data. This solution will provide the ability to manage fine-grained permissions for the data and minimize operational overhead.

https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/cloudfront-access-to-amazon-s3/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/private-content-restricting-access-to-s3.html#private-content-restricting-access-to-s3-overview

EC2 instance Savings Plan saves 72% while Compute Savings Plans saves 66%. But according to link, it says "Compute Savings Plans provide the most flexibility and help to reduce your costs by up to 66%. These plans automatically apply to EC2 instance usage regardless of instance family, size, AZ, region, OS or tenancy, and also apply to Fargate and Lambda usage." EC2 instance Savings Plans are not applied to Fargate or Lambda

AWS Global Accelerator and Amazon CloudFront are separate services that use the AWS global network and its edge locations around the world. CloudFront improves performance for both cacheable content (such as images and videos) and dynamic content (such as API acceleration and dynamic site delivery). Global Accelerator improves performance for a wide range of applications over TCP or UDP by proxying packets at the edge to applications running in one or more AWS Regions. Global Accelerator is a good fit for non-HTTP use cases, such as gaming (UDP), IoT (MQTT), or Voice over IP, as well as for HTTP use cases that specifically require static IP addresses or deterministic, fast regional failover. Both services integrate with AWS Shield for DDoS protection.

This solution meets the requirements of creating digital copies for a large collection of historical written records, analyzing the documents, extracting the medical information, and storing the documents so that an application can run SQL queries on the data. Writing the document information to an Amazon S3 bucket can provide scalable and durable storage for the scanned files. Using Amazon Athena to query the data can provide serverless and interactive SQL analysis on data stored in S3. Creating an AWS Lambda function that runs when new documents are uploaded can provide event-driven and serverless processing of the scanned files. Using Amazon Textract to convert the documents to raw text can provide accurate optical character recognition (OCR) and extraction of structured data such as tables and forms from documents using artificial intelligence (AI). Using Amazon Comprehend Medical to detect and extract relevant medical information from the text can provide natural language processing (NLP) service that uses machine learning that has been pre-trained to understand and extract health data from medical text.

Option A is incorrect because writing the document information to an Amazon EC2 instance that runs a MySQL database can increase the infrastructure overhead and complexity, and it may not be able to handle large volumes of data. Option C is incorrect because creating an Auto Scaling group of Amazon EC2 instances to run a custom application that processes the scanned files and extracts the medical information can increase the infrastructure overhead and complexity, and it may not be able to leverageexisting AI and NLP services such as Textract and Comprehend Medical. Option D is incorrect because using Amazon Rekognition to convert the documents to raw text can provide image and video analysis, but it does not support OCR or extraction of structured data from documents. Using Amazon Transcribe Medical to detect and extract relevant medical information from the text can provide speech-to-text transcription service for medical conversations, but it does not support text analysis or extraction of health data from medical text.

SCPs are a type of organization policy that you can use to manage permissions in your organization. SCPs offer central control over the maximum available permissions for all accounts in your organization. SCPs help you to ensure your accounts stay within your organization’s access control guidelines1.

To apply an SCP to a specific set of accounts, you need to create an OU for those accounts and attach the SCP to the OU. This way, the SCP affects only the member accounts in that OU and not the other accounts in the organization. If you attach the SCP to the root OU, it will apply to all accounts in the organization, including the production account, which is not the desired outcome. If you attach the SCP to the management account, it will have no effect, as SCPs do not affect users or roles in the management account1.

Therefore, the best solutions to deploy the SCP are B and E. Option B attaches the SCP directly to the three nonproduction accounts, while option E creates a separate OU for the nonproductionaccounts and attaches the SCP to the OU. Both options will achieve the same result of restricting the EC2instance types in the nonproduction accounts, but option E might be more scalable and manageable if there are more accounts or policies to be applied in the future2.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/autoscaling/application/userguide/application-auto-scaling-target-tracking.html

This answer is correct because it meets the requirements of migrating a 20 TB MySQL database within 2 weeks with minimal downtime and cost-effectively. The AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized device has up to 80 TB of usable storage space, which is enough to fit the database. The AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) can migrate data from MySQL to Amazon Aurora, Amazon RDS for MySQL, or MySQL on Amazon EC2 with minimal downtime by continuously replicating changes from the source to the target. The AWS Schema Conversion Tool (AWS SCT) can convert the source schema and code to a format compatible with the target database. By using these services together, the company can migrate the database to AWS with minimal downtime and cost. The Snowball Edge device can be shipped back to AWS to finish the migration and continue the ongoing replication until the database is fully migrated.

This approach ensures that the order creation and payment processing steps are separate and atomic. By sending the order information to an SQS FIFO queue, the payment service can process the order one at a time and in the order they were received. If the payment service is unable to process an order, it can be retried later, preventing the creation of multiple orders. The deletion of the message from the queue after it is processed will prevent the same message from being processed multiple times.

This option is the most suitable way to improve the game’s metadata load times without migrating the database. Amazon ElastiCache for Redis is a fully managed, in-memory data store that provides sub-millisecond latency and high throughput for read-intensive workloads. You can use it as a caching layer in front of your RDS DB instance to store frequently accessed metadata and reduce the load on thedatabase. You can also take advantage of Redis features such as snapshots, replication, and data persistence to ensure data durability and availability. ElastiCache for Redis scales automatically to meet your demand and integrates with other AWS services such as CloudFormation, CloudWatch, and IAM.

Option A is not optimal because migrating the database to Amazon Aurora with Aurora Replicas would incur additional costs and complexity. Amazon Aurora is a relational database service that provides high performance, availability, and compatibility with MySQL and PostgreSQL. Aurora Replicas are read-only copies of the primary database that can be used for scaling read capacity and enhancing availability. However, migrating the database to Aurora would require modifying the application code, testing the compatibility, and performing the data migration. Moreover, Aurora Replicas may not provide sub-millisecond response times as ElastiCache for Redis does.

Option B is not optimal because migrating the database to Amazon DynamoDB with global tables would incur additional costs and complexity. Amazon DynamoDB is a NoSQL database service that provides fast and flexible data access for any scale. Global tables are a feature of DynamoDB that enables you to replicate your data across multiple AWS Regions for high availability and performance. However, migrating the database to DynamoDB would require changing the data model, modifying the application code, and performing the data migration. Moreover, global tables may not be necessary for the game’s metadata, as they are mainly used for cross-region data access and disaster recovery.

Option D is not optimal because adding an Amazon ElastiCache for Memcached layer in front of the database would not provide the same capabilities as ElastiCache for Redis. Amazon ElastiCache for Memcached is another fully managed, in-memory data store that provides high performance and scalability for caching workloads. However, Memcached does not support snapshots, replication, or data persistence, which means that the cached data may be lost in case of a node failure or a cache eviction. Moreover, Memcached does not integrate with other AWS services as well as Redis does. Therefore, ElastiCache for Redis is a better choice for this scenario. References:

What Is Amazon ElastiCache for Redis?

What Is Amazon Aurora?

What Is Amazon DynamoDB?

What Is Amazon ElastiCache for Memcached?

https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/implementations/aws-streaming-data-solution-for-amazon-kinesis/

Queue has Limited throughput (300 msg/s without batching, 3000 msg/s with batching whereby up-to 10 msg per batch operation; Msg duplicates not allowed in the queue (exactly-once delivery); Msg order is preserved (FIFO); Queue name must end with .fifo

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/dns-failover-types.html

Amazon Athena is the best choice for running one-time queries on streaming data. Although Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics provides an easy and familiar standard SQL language to analyze streaming data in real-time, it is designed for continuous queries rather than one-time queries[1]. On the other hand, Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows querying data in Amazon S3 using SQL. It is optimized for ad-hoc querying and is ideal for running one-time queries on streaming data[2].AWS Lake Formation uses as a central place to have all your data for analytics purposes (E). Athena integrate perfect with S3 and can makes queries (A).

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/rds-custom.htmlandhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/working-with-custom-oracle.html

This option is the only solution that meets the requirements because it allows the company to encrypt the data with its own encryption keys and tools outside the AWS Cloud. By encrypting the data at the company’s data center before storing the data in the S3 bucket, the company can ensure that the data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and that the company has full control over the encryption keys and processes. This option also avoids the need to use any AWS encryption services or features, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.

A. Encrypt the data in the S3 bucket with server-side encryption (SSE) that uses an AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) customer managed key. This option does not meet the requirements because it does not allow the company to manage the encryption keys outside the AWS Cloud. Although the company can create and use its own customer managed key in AWSKMS, the key is still stored and managed by AWS KMS, which is a service within the AWS Cloud. Moreover, the company still needs to use the AWS encryption features and APIs to encrypt and decrypt the data in the S3 bucket, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.

B. Encrypt the data in the S3 bucket with server-side encryption (SSE) that uses an AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) AWS managed key. This option does not meet the requirements because it does not allow the company to manage the encryption keys outside the AWS Cloud. In this option, the company uses the default AWS managed key in AWS KMS, which is created and managed by AWS on behalf of the company. The company has no control over the key rotation, deletion, or recovery policies. Moreover, the company still needs to use the AWS encryption features and APIs to encrypt and decrypt the data in the S3 bucket, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.

C. Encrypt the data in the S3 bucket with the default server-side encryption (SSE). This option does not meet the requirements because it does not allow the company to manage the encryption keys outside the AWS Cloud. In this option, the company uses the default server-side encryption with Amazon S3 managed keys (SSE-S3), which is applied to every bucket in Amazon S3. The company has no visibility or control over the encryption keys, which are managed by Amazon S3. Moreover, the company still needs to use the AWS encryption features and APIs to encrypt and decrypt the data in the S3 bucket, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.