Pass the CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply L4M5 Questions and answers with ValidTests

The bargaining power of buyers increases when the buyer is large relative to the supplier. A large buyer can leverage its size to negotiate more favorable terms due to its significant impact on the supplier's business. CIPS notes that a buyer’s size and purchasing volume are key factors that enhance its negotiating power in buyer-supplier relationships.

The analysis of cost into fixed and variable enables organisations to determine their break-even point (BE) - the point where total revenue from sales and total cost exactly balance. All costs need to be covered by sale revenue in order for a company to make a profit. If you know your fixed costs and your variable costs then you can work out the minimum quantity of goods or services you need to sell to break even. Break even point is measured in volume and can be worked out graphically or via formulae:

Price - Variable costs = Contribution

Break even point (volume) = Fixed expenses/Contribution margin per unit

In this scenario, the break even point (Q) is: 270,000/(180-126) = 5,000

To make a profit, the supplier needs to sell more than 5,000 units per month.

The BE point is thus an important determinant of flexibility of pricing for suppliers. Before BE is achieved there will be much greater reluctance to offer price concessions to customers than after BE is achieved.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Competing is assertive and uncooperative, a power-oriented mode. When competing, an individual pursues his or her own concerns at the other person’s expense, using whatever power seems appropriate to win his or her position. Competing might mean standing up for your rights, defending a position you believe is correct, or simply trying to win. Competing will not allow long-term relationship to flourish.

Compromising is intermediate in both assertiveness and cooperativeness. When compromising, the objective is to find an expedient, mutually acceptable solution that partially satisfies both parties. Compromising falls on a middle ground between competing and accommodating, giving up more than competing but less than accommodating. Likewise, it addresses an issue more directly than avoiding but doesn’t explore it in as much depth as collaborating. Compromising might mean splitting the difference, exchanging concessions, or seeking a quick middle-ground position. It is a valid approach when long-term relationships are at stake and it is important to find some common ground on which to base an agreement. Both sides get something but not everything. Therefore, this is the most appropriate for this scenario.

Avoiding is unassertive and uncooperative. When avoiding, an individual does not immediately pursue his or her own concerns or those of the other person. He or she does not address the conflict. Avoiding might take the form of diplomatically sidestepping an issue, postponing an issue until a better time, or simply withdrawing from a threatening situation. In the scenario, both parties want to take the opportunity, then avoiding is not an appropriate solution.

Accommodating is unassertive and cooperative—the opposite of competing. When accommodating, an individual neglects his or her own concerns to satisfy the concerns of the other person; there is an element of self-sacrifice in this mode. Accommodating might take theform of selfless generosity or charity, obeying another person’s order when you would prefer not to, or yielding to another’s point of view. In the scenario, neither party shall concede all of their requirements, it is unnecessary to adopt this approach.

LO 1, AC 1.1

Monopolistic competition exists in market where there are many competing producers but they will try to use product differentiation. Although their products may be very similar, their ability to differentiate means that they can act as monopolies in short run, irrespective of the actions of their competitors.

In perfect competition, there are no barriers to entry to the market or exit from the market. In monopolistic competition, there tend to be fewer barriers to entry or exit in these markets than in oligopolistic markets, but it doesn't mean that there are absolutely no barriers to entry in monopolistic competition.

In perfect competition, the demand curve is perfectly elastic, which means that it will be horizontal. Otherwise, in monopolistic competition market, the demand curve will have normal downward slope.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Using webcams in a web conference means you are able to communicate both verbally and non verbally.

Over the phone, you cannot see TOP, the only cue/signal you have regarding their mood, interest and attitude is person's voice, intonation and any delay.

A teleconference is a telephone meeting among two or more participants involving technology more sophisticated than a simple two-way phone connection.

In-person meeting requires you team and TOP to be in the same place at the same time.

LO 2, AC 2.4

The case in the question is illustrated as below:

The equilibrium price initially at P0 with quantity Q0, when supply curve shifts to the left, it will converge with demand curve at new equilibrium point with price P1 and quantity Q1. As you can see from the graph, P1 is greater than P0 and Q1 is smaller than Q0.

There are two major persuasion methods: 'push' and 'pull'.

Persuasion can be defined as encouraging someone to do something that you want them to do for you. Persuasion is reasoning with someone so that they will believe or do something they might not otherwise do. Persuasion can be considered as 'pushing' on TOP so that they can accept the change in attitude or behaviour as a result of your actions.

Influence is the ability to affect the manner of thinking of another. Influence can be considered as pulling on TOP so that you achieve the same result, but TOP feels they have changed their attitude or behaviour as a result of their reflection and thinking, and not your direct actions.

There are multiple variables to consider when choosing between 'push' and 'pull'. Professor Fiona Dent of Ashridge Business School proposes situations when each style might be most appropriate, breaking down push into 'directive' and 'reasoning' and 'pull' into 'collaborative' and 'visionary':

Table Description automatically generated

Text Description automatically generated

Using logical and objective reasons is one of the typical characteristics of persuasion reasoning method.

According to Paul Steele's 'The Seller's Perspective', customer can be classified into 4 categories as below:

In this scenario, although SBL's spend claims large portion in suppliers' revenues, their draconian treatment will reduce SBL's attractiveness in supplier's perspective. SBL falls into Exploit quadrant. With exploitable customers, suppliers tend to 'milk' the customer and charge a high price to compensate for all the pain customer put on them.

There are four types of questions that can be used in a commercial negotiation:

Hypothetical questions, where you ask about a possible situation or abstract concept, are very useful at the testing and proposal phases. Hypothetical question does not state any commitment as it is only about 'if something happens, then ...'. This type of question can be useful at giving suggestion.

Text Description automatically generated

LO 3, AC 3.3