An “after action” review is a structured process following an incident, drill, or actual disaster, in which events are documented, timelines are reconstructed, and lessons learned are gathered. Its purpose is to identify what went well, what failed, and what can be improved in future responses.
Testing (A) refers to evaluating procedures before an event.
Quality assurance (B) focuses on performance and compliance but not necessarily post-event analysis.
"All of the above" (D) is incorrect because only after action includes all these specific elements.
[References:, , ASIS POA Manual – After Action Reviews, , PSP Study Guide – Post-Incident Analysis and Improvement]
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit