Conflicting feedback from different disciplines during the design process is common. A structured approach to resolving these conflicts ensures alignment with project quality goals while integrating diverse technical perspectives.
Consensus-Building Approach:
Conduct structured design coordination meetings with key stakeholders.
Use a decision matrix to evaluate feedback based on project quality impact and feasibility.
Establish a resolution process that prioritizes project goals while addressing discipline-specific concerns.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
Option A (Choosing the Most Technically Advanced Discipline): This overlooks project-specific constraints and stakeholder needs.
Option B (Avoiding Conflicting Feedback): Ignoring critical input can lead to design failures and quality issues later in construction.
Option C (Considering Feedback from the Highest Authority): While authority matters, evidence-based decision-making ensures better project outcomes.
Best Practices for Managing Conflicting Feedback:
Engage multidisciplinary teams in collaborative workshops (design charettes, value engineering).
Use digital modeling tools (BIM) to visualize conflicts and explore resolution options.
Refer to Project Quality Standards (ISO, DOE, NAVFAC) to ensure compliance-driven decisions.
Managing Design and Construction Using Systems Engineering (Conflict Resolution in Design).
Quality Management in Construction Projects (Ensuring Design Quality Through Consensus).
ASQ Construction Quality Management (CQM) References:
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit