Pre-Summer Special Limited Time 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: validbest

Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor All Questions
Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor All Questions

View all questions & answers for the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam

PECB AI management system (AIMS) ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Question # 11 Topic 2 Discussion

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Topic 2 Question 11 Discussion:
Question #: 11
Topic #: 2

Scenario 3 (continued):

ArBank is a financial institution located in Brussels, Belgium, which offers a diverse range of banking and investment servicesto its clients. To ensure the continual improvement of its operations, ArBank has implemented a quality management system QMS based

on ISO 9001 and an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on the requirements of ISO/IEC 42001.

Audrey, an experienced auditor, led an internal audit focused on the AIMS within ArBank. She assessed the chatbots integrated into thebank's website and mobile app, analyzing communications using big data technology to identify potential noncompliance, fraud, orunethical conduct. Instead of relying solely on the information provided by the chatbots, Audrey sought out evidence that would eitherconfirm or challenge the validity of the data, ensuring her conclusions were based on reliable and accurate information. Her review ofselected chatbot interactions confirmed they met their intended purpose.

For the specific context of ArBank's operations, Audrey utilized an Al system to assess the efficiency of the bank's digital infrastructure,focusing on tasks critical to the Finance Department. This Al system was able to analyze the functionality of chatbots integrated intoArBank's website and mobile app to determine if it adheres to ISO/IEC 42001 requirements and internal policies governing customerservice in the banking sector.

In addition, Audrey conducted a deeper assessment of the bank’s AIMS. Her evaluation included observing different stages of the AIMSlife cycle, from development to deployment, to ensure that roles and responsibilities were clearly defined and aligned with ArBank’soperational goals. She also evaluated the tools used to monitor and measure the performance of the AIMS.

Audrey continued the audit process by auditing ArBank's outsourced operations. Upon checking the contractual agreements between thetwo parties, Audrey decided that there was no need to gather audit evidence regarding the contractual agreement. She reviewed thecompany's processes for monitoring the quality of outsourced operations, determined whether appropriate governanceprocesses are inplace with regard to the engagement of outsourced persons or organizations, and reviewed and evaluated the company's plans in case ofexpected or unexpected termination of the outsourcing agreement.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Question:

Did Audrey conduct the audit process for the outsourced operation correctly? Refer to Scenario 3.


A.

Yes, she reviewed the company’s processes for monitoring the quality of outsourced operations


B.

No, she should have gathered audit evidence concerning the contractual agreement between the two parties


C.

No, Audrey should not have been responsible for determining whether appropriate governance processes are in place for engaging outsourced persons or organizations


D.

Yes, but only if the contract terms were re-audited


Get Premium ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Questions

Contribute your Thoughts:


Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.