Pre-Summer Special Limited Time 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: validbest

Exam PMI-ACP All Questions
Exam PMI-ACP All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PMI-ACP exam

PMI Agile PMI-ACP Question # 40 Topic 5 Discussion

PMI-ACP Exam Topic 5 Question 40 Discussion:
Question #: 40
Topic #: 5

A team retrospective was going well until the team lead introduced the "define the next experiment" topic; then the discussion became an argument. A new team member feels strongly that the approach used on their previous team would improve this team's efficiency and effectiveness. The team lead is adamant that they remain with the current approach and the discussion dissolves into a circular argument.


A.

Remind the group that all input is welcome but dissension is not productive and suggest the group move on to another task more agreeable to everyone.


B.

Restate both stances, ask for details of both approaches, and create a chart of similarities and differences.


C.

Construct an Ishikawa diagram for each approach, and use the 5 Whys technique to determine the effectiveness of each approach.


D.

Interject and request this experiment be postponed for 2 months, so the new team member has time to observe the current approach.


Get Premium PMI-ACP Questions

Contribute your Thoughts:


Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.