Pass the ECCouncil CEH v13 312-50v13 Questions and answers with ValidTests

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is covered in CEH v13 Module 12: Hacking Web Applications. It occurs when an attacker tricks a victim’s browser into making unintended, authenticated requests to a web application where the victim is already logged in.

Example:

User logs in to a banking site.

While logged in, the attacker sends the user a crafted link that submits a transaction via a hidden request.

Since the user’s session cookies are valid, the bank processes the request.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Session hijacking: Steals session tokens but doesn’t involve forcing browser actions.

B. SSRF: Server sends a request to an internal service, not via user's browser.

D. XSS: Executes scripts in the user’s browser but doesn't force HTTP requests under the user’s identity.

Restrict results to those of a certain filetype. E.g., PDF, DOCX, TXT, PPT, etc. Note: The “ext:” operator can also be used—the results are identical.

Example: apple filetype:pdf / apple ext:pdf

One of the biggest problems a worm faces in achieving a very fast rate of infection is “getting off the ground.” although a worm spreads exponentially throughout the early stages of infection, the time needed to infect say the first 10,000 hosts dominates the infection time.

There is a straightforward way for an active worm a simple this obstacle, that we term hit-list scanning. Before the worm is free, the worm author collects a listing of say ten,000 to 50,000 potentially vulnerable machines, ideally ones with sensible network connections. The worm, when released onto an initial machine on this hit-list, begins scanning down the list. once it infects a machine, it divides the hit-list in half, communicating half to the recipient worm, keeping the other half.

This fast division ensures that even if only 10-20% of the machines on the hit-list are actually vulnerable, an active worm can quickly bear the hit-list and establish itself on all vulnerable machines in only some seconds. though the hit-list could begin at 200 kilobytes, it quickly shrinks to nothing during the partitioning. This provides a great benefit in constructing a quick worm by speeding the initial infection.

The hit-list needn’t be perfect: a simple list of machines running a selected server sort could serve, though larger accuracy can improve the unfold. The hit-list itself is generated victimization one or many of the following techniques, ready well before, typically with very little concern of detection.

Stealthy scans. Portscans are so common and then wide ignored that even a quick scan of the whole net would be unlikely to attract law enforcement attention or over gentle comment within the incident response community. However, for attackers wish to be particularly careful, a randomised sneaky scan taking many months would be not possible to attract much attention, as most intrusion detection systems are not currently capable of detecting such low-profile scans. Some portion of the scan would be out of date by the time it had been used, however abundant of it’d not.

Distributed scanning. an assailant might scan the web using a few dozen to some thousand already-compromised “zombies,” the same as what DDOS attackers assemble in a very fairly routine fashion. Such distributed scanning has already been seen within the wild–Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory received ten throughout the past year.

DNS searches. Assemble a list of domains (for example, by using wide offered spam mail lists, or trolling the address registries). The DNS will then be searched for the science addresses of mail-servers (via mx records) or net servers (by looking for www.domain.com).

Spiders. For net server worms (like Code Red), use Web-crawling techniques the same as search engines so as to produce a list of most Internet-connected web sites. this would be unlikely to draw in serious attention.

Public surveys. for many potential targets there may be surveys available listing them, like the Netcraft survey.

Just listen. Some applications, like peer-to-peer networks, wind up advertising many of their servers. Similarly, many previous worms effectively broadcast that the infected machine is vulnerable to further attack. easy, because of its widespread scanning, during the Code Red I infection it was easy to select up the addresses of upwards of 300,000 vulnerable IIS servers–because each came knock on everyone’s door!

The described scenario is a textbook example of a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack. In such attacks, the attacker stealthily places themselves between two communicating systems, intercepts their communications, and may even modify the traffic. The communicating parties remain unaware that their traffic is being monitored or altered.

Eric is using the Dsniff toolset, which is well-known for enabling MITM attacks through techniques such as:

ARP spoofing (to redirect traffic)

Credential sniffing

Packet manipulation

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 8: Sniffing

Module 11: Session Hijacking

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“In a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack, the attacker intercepts and potentially alters the communication between two systems without either party knowing. Tools like Dsniff, Cain & Abel, and Ettercap are commonly used to launch such attacks.”

Incorrect Options:

A: “Interceptor” is not a technical term in cybersecurity.

C: ARP Proxy is a network feature; while ARP spoofing can be part of a MITM attack, it’s not the attack classification itself.

D: Poisoning (like DNS or ARP poisoning) is often a technique used to initiate MITM but not the final classification.

In CEH v13 Module 01: Information Security Controls, the Remote Access Policy is defined as the guideline that governs:

Which remote access methods (VPNs, modems, RDP, etc.) are permitted.

Requirements for authentication and encryption.

Who is authorized to use them and under what conditions.

In This Case:

The use of a dial-out modem is considered a remote access method, especially if it bypasses the corporate firewall.

The analyst needs to check whether such remote access is permitted, and under what security controls.

Reconnaissance is the first phase of ethical hacking and also part of the cyber kill chain. It involves gathering publicly available information about a target, such as employee names, company structure, and branding, which is later used in social engineering or phishing attacks.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 2: Footprinting and Reconnaissance

Quote:

“Reconnaissance involves gathering information from public sources such as websites, social networks, and press releases. This is used to craft targeted phishing messages or exploit organizational weaknesses.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A & B. Not formal terms in ethical hacking.

D. Enumeration involves interacting with systems to extract technical data.

According to CEH v13 Module 04: Enumeration and Module 08: Sniffing, packet sniffers such as Wireshark, tcpdump, and EtherApe are designed to capture and analyze network traffic at the data link (Layer 2) and network (Layer 3) layers of the OSI model.

At Layer 2 (Data Link), sniffers capture Ethernet frames, including MAC addresses and frame type.

At Layer 3 (Network), sniffers interpret IP headers, IP addresses, and transport layer protocols (TCP, UDP).

They do not operate at Layer 1 (Physical) as they do not deal with raw electrical signals.

Packet sniffers also do not manipulate traffic but passively monitor and capture packets that traverse the network.

Therefore, the correct statement is:

Packet Sniffers operate on both Layer 2 & Layer 3 of the OSI model.

Option Analysis:

A. Layer 1: ❌ Incorrect. Layer 1 is the physical layer (electrical, optical signals).

B. Layer 2: ❌ Partially correct but incomplete.

C. Both Layer 2 & Layer 3: Correct. Full coverage of packet sniffing capabilities.

D. Layer 3: ❌ Partially correct but incomplete.

Reference from CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 08 – Sniffing, Section: How Packet Sniffers Work

CEH iLabs: Capturing Ethernet Frames and IP Packets Using Wireshark

OSI Model Mapping in CEH Official eBook

This falls under Requirement 8 of PCI DSS: "Identify and authenticate access to system components," which supports the objective of implementing strong access control measures.

CEH v13 Reference:

Module 20: Hacking Mobile Platforms and IoT – Compliance Standards

"PCI DSS requires unique identification for each person with access to ensure accountability and access control."

In CEH v13 Module 02: Footprinting and Reconnaissance, the OSINT Framework is introduced as a collection of free, open-source tools and resources to aid ethical hackers in passive reconnaissance.

Key Features of OSINT Framework:

Web-based visual tool that maps out links to open-source intelligence tools.

Allows collection of emails, domains, usernames, IPs, social media data, and more.

Focuses on passive footprinting to avoid detection.

Option Clarification:

A. WebSploit Framework: Used for man-in-the-middle attacks and web vulnerabilities.

B. Browser Exploitation Framework (BeEF): Browser-focused attack tool.

C. OSINT Framework: Correct — open-source intelligence and reconnaissance.

D. SpeedPhish Framework: Phishing simulation tool, not used for passive information gathering.

Email spoofing is the fabrication of an email header in the hopes of duping the recipient into thinking the email originated from someone or somewhere other than the intended source. Because core email protocols do not have a built-in method of authentication, it is common for spam and phishing emails to use said spoofing to trick the recipient into trusting the origin of the message.

The ultimate goal of email spoofing is to get recipients to open, and possibly even respond to, a solicitation. Although the spoofed messages are usually just a nuisance requiring little action besides removal, the more malicious varieties can cause significant problems and sometimes pose a real security threat.

==================================================================

Software as a service (SaaS) allows users to attach to and use cloud-based apps over the web. Common examples ar email, calendaring and workplace tool (such as Microsoft workplace 365).

SaaS provides a whole software solution that you get on a pay-as-you-go basis from a cloud service provider. You rent the use of an app for your organisation and your users connect with it over the web, typically with an internet browser. All of the underlying infrastructure, middleware, app software system and app knowledge ar located within the service provider’s knowledge center. The service provider manages the hardware and software system and with the appropriate service agreement, can make sure the availability and also the security of the app and your data as well. SaaS allows your organisation to induce quickly up and running with an app at token upfront cost.

Common SaaS scenarios

This tool having used a web-based email service like Outlook, Hotmail or Yahoo! Mail, then you have got already used a form of SaaS. With these services, you log into your account over the web, typically from an internet browser. the e-mail software system is found on the service provider’s network and your messages ar hold on there moreover. you can access your email and hold on messages from an internet browser on any laptop or Internet-connected device.

The previous examples are free services for personal use. For organisational use, you can rent productivity apps, like email, collaboration and calendaring; and sophisticated business applications like client relationship management (CRM), enterprise resource coming up with (ERP) and document management. You buy the use of those apps by subscription or per the level of use.

Advantages of SaaS

Gain access to stylish applications. to supply SaaS apps to users, you don’t ought to purchase, install, update or maintain any hardware, middleware or software system. SaaS makes even sophisticated enterprise applications, like ERP and CRM, affordable for organisations that lack the resources to shop for, deploy and manage the specified infrastructure and software system themselves.

Pay just for what you utilize. you furthermore may economize because the SaaS service automatically scales up and down per the level of usage.

Use free shopper software system. Users will run most SaaS apps directly from their web browser without needing to transfer and install any software system, though some apps need plugins. this suggests that you simply don’t ought to purchase and install special software system for your users.

Mobilise your hands simply. SaaS makes it simple to “mobilise” your hands as a result of users will access SaaS apps and knowledge from any Internet-connected laptop or mobile device. You don’t ought to worry concerning developing apps to run on differing types of computers and devices as a result of the service supplier has already done therefore. additionally, you don’t ought to bring special experience aboard to manage the safety problems inherent in mobile computing. A fastidiously chosen service supplier can make sure the security of your knowledge, no matter the sort of device intense it.

Access app knowledge from anyplace. With knowledge hold on within the cloud, users will access their info from any Internet-connected laptop or mobile device. And once app knowledge is hold on within the cloud, no knowledge is lost if a user’s laptop or device fails.

Employing a tool like Sublist3r, which is designed to enumerate the subdomains of websites using OSINT, would be the most effective method to accomplish this goal. This option works as follows:

Sublist3r is a python tool designed to enumerate subdomains of websites using OSINT (Open Source Intelligence). It helps penetration testers and bug hunters collect and gather subdomains for the domain they are targeting. Sublist3r enumerates subdomains using many search engines such as Google, Yahoo, Bing, Baidu, and Ask. Sublist3r also enumerates subdomains using Netcraft, Virustotal, ThreatCrowd, DNSdumpster, and ReverseDNS. Subbrute was integrated with Sublist3r to increase the possibility of finding more subdomains using bruteforce with an improved wordlist1.

By using Sublist3r, the tester can quickly and efficiently discover the subdomains of the target organization’s website, which can provide valuable information about the network structure, the services offered, the potential vulnerabilities, and the attack surface. Sublist3r can also be used to perform passive reconnaissance, which does not send any packets to the target domain, and thus avoids detection by the target organization12.

The other options are not as effective as option A for the following reasons:

B. Analyzing Linkedin profiles to find employees of the target company and their job titles: This option is not relevant because it does not address the subdomain enumeration task, but the social engineering task. Linkedin is a social networking platform that allows users to create and share their professional profiles, which may include their name, job title, company, skills, education, and contacts. By analyzing Linkedin profiles, the tester may be able to find employees of the target company and their job titles, which can be useful for crafting phishing emails, impersonating employees, or exploiting human weaknesses. However, this option does not help to discover the subdomains of the target organization’s website, which is the goal of this scenario3.

C. Utilizing the Harvester tool to extract email addresses related to the target domain using a search engine like Google or Bing: This option is not sufficient because it does not provide a comprehensive list of subdomains, but only a partial list based on email addresses. The Harvester is a tool that can extract email addresses, subdomains, hosts, employee names, open ports, and banners from different public sources, such as search engines, PGP key servers, and SHODAN computer database. By using the Harvester, the tester may be able to extract some email addresses related to the target domain, which can reveal some subdomains, such as mail.target.com or support.target.com. However, this option does not guarantee to find all the subdomains of the target organization’s website, as some subdomains may not have any email addresses associated with them, or may not be indexed by the search engines4.

D. Using a people search service, such as Spokeo or Intelius, to gather information about the employees of the target organization: This option is not applicable because it does not address the subdomain enumeration task, but the personal information gathering task. Spokeo and Intelius are people search services that can provide various information about individuals, such as their name, address, phone number, email, social media, criminal records, and financial history. By using these services, the tester may be able to gather information about the employees of the target organization, which can be useful for performing background checks, identity theft, or blackmail. However, this option does not help to discover the subdomains of the target organization’s website, which is the goal of this scenario56.

The virus described changes its own code with each execution but still performs the same actions. This is the hallmark of a Metamorphic Virus. Unlike polymorphic viruses (which use encrypted code with a changing decryptor), metamorphic viruses rewrite their own code entirely — including their decryption and execution routines — to avoid pattern detection by antivirus software.

Key characteristics of metamorphic viruses seen in the scenario:

Mutates completely on every execution.

Keeps overall functionality identical (semantics intact).

Alters its appearance and logic flow.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats → Types of Viruses and Obfuscation Techniques

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Metamorphic viruses modify their own code structure and appearance with each iteration, without altering their underlying behavior. This makes them more difficult to detect through signature-based mechanisms.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Polymorphic viruses encrypt themselves with a changing decryptor stub but do not change their core logic.

C: “Dravidic Virus” is not a recognized term in cybersecurity.

D: Stealth viruses hide their presence (e.g., by intercepting system calls), but do not change their code structure.

A Multipartite Virus is designed to infect both the boot sector and executable files of a system. This makes it more complex and harder to remove than viruses that target only one area. It can spread in multiple ways and activate under different conditions depending on whether the infected file or boot sector is accessed first.

CEH v13 Official Curriculum states:

“Multipartite viruses infect both the boot sector and program files. They are difficult to remove and can reinfect the system unless both locations are cleaned simultaneously.”

Incorrect Options:

A. Polymorphic viruses change their code signatures but do not necessarily target both boot and executable areas.

B. Stealth viruses conceal their presence, often by intercepting system calls.

D. Macro viruses infect macro-enabled files, typically in Microsoft Office documents.

Reference – CEH v13 Guide:

Module 06: Malware Threats

Topic: Types of Malware – Multipartite Viruses

The sequence of actions that would provide the most comprehensive information about the network’s status is to use Hping3 for an ICMP ping scan on the entire subnet, then use Nmap for a SYN scan on identified active hosts, and finally use Metasploit to exploit identified vulnerabilities. This sequence of actions works as follows:

Use Hping3 for an ICMP ping scan on the entire subnet: This action is used to discover the active hosts on the network by sending ICMP echo request packets to each possible IP address on the subnet and waiting for ICMP echo reply packets from the hosts. Hping3 is a command-line tool that can craft and send custom packets, such as TCP, UDP, or ICMP, and analyze the responses. By using Hping3 for an ICMP ping scan, the hacker can quickly and efficiently identify the live hosts on the network, as well as their response times and packet loss rates12.

Use Nmap for a SYN scan on identified active hosts: This action is used to scan the open ports and services on the active hosts by sending TCP SYN packets to a range of ports and analyzing the TCP responses. Nmap is a popular and powerful tool that can perform various types of network scans, such as port scanning, service detection, OS detection, and vulnerability scanning. By using Nmap for a SYN scan, the hacker can determine the state of the ports on the active hosts, such as open, closed, filtered, or unfiltered, as well as the services and protocols running on them. A SYN scan is also known as a stealth scan, as it does not complete the TCP three-way handshake and thus avoids logging on the target system34.

Use Metasploit to exploit identified vulnerabilities: This action is used to exploit the vulnerabilities on the active hosts by using pre-built or custom modules that leverage the open ports and services. Metasploit is a framework that contains a collection of tools and modules for penetration testing and exploitation. By using Metasploit, the hacker can launch various attacks on the active hosts, such as remote code execution, privilege escalation, or backdoor installation, and gain access to the target system or data. Metasploit can also be used to perform post-exploitation tasks, such as gathering information, maintaining persistence, or pivoting to other systems .

The other options are not as comprehensive as option B for the following reasons:

A. Initiate with Nmap for a ping sweep, then use Metasploit to scan for open ports and services, and finally use Hping3 to perform remote OS fingerprinting: This option is not optimal because it does not use the tools in the most efficient and effective way. Nmap can perform a ping sweep, but it is slower and less flexible than Hping3, which can craft and send custom packets. Metasploit can scan for open ports and services, but it is more suitable for exploitation than scanning, and it relies on Nmap for port scanning anyway. Hping3 can perform remote OS fingerprinting, but it is less accurate and reliable than Nmap, which can use various techniques and probes to determine the OS type and version13 .

C. Start with Hping3 for a UDP scan on random ports, then use Nmap for a version detection scan, and finally use Metasploit to exploit detected vulnerabilities: This option is not effective because it does not use the best scanning methods and techniques. Hping3 can perform a UDP scan, but it is slower and less reliable than a TCP scan, as UDP is a connectionless protocol that does not always generate responses. Scanning random ports is also inefficient and incomplete, as it may miss important ports or services. Nmap can perform a version detection scan, but it is more useful to perform a port scan first, as it can narrow down the scope and speed up the scan. Metasploit can exploit detected vulnerabilities, but it is not clear how the hacker can identify the vulnerabilities without performing a vulnerability scan first13 .

D. Begin with NetScanTools Pro for a general network scan, then use Nmap for OS detection and version detection, and finally perform an SYN flooding with Hping3: This option is not comprehensive because it does not cover all the aspects and objectives of a network scan. NetScanTools Pro is a graphical tool that can perform various network tasks, such as ping, traceroute, DNS lookup, or port scan, but it is less powerful and versatile than Nmap or Hping3, which can perform more advanced and customized scans. Nmap can perform OS detection and version detection, but it is more useful to perform a port scan first, as it can provide more information and insights into the target system. Performing an SYN flooding with Hping3 is not a network scan, but a denial-of-service attack, which can disrupt the network and alert the target system, and it is not an ethical or legal action for a hired hacker13 .

Mar 1, 2016, 7:33:28 AM 10.240.250.23 - 54373 10.249.253.15 - 22 tcp_ip

Let's just disassemble this entry.

Mar 1, 2016, 7:33:28 AM - time of the request

10.240.250.23 - 54373 - client's IP and port

10.249.253.15 - server IP

- 22 - SSH port

These types of attacks occur when faults or glitches are INJECTED into the Power supply that can be used for remote execution.

The described method is a classic example of a Side-Channel Attack, specifically a Timing Attack.

Key characteristics:

It exploits variations in response time from a system to infer sensitive information, such as the correct number of characters in a password.

In this scenario, if a correct character causes a longer processing time, the attacker can deduce the correct sequence iteratively.

According to CEH v13:

Side-channel attacks do not directly break encryption but rely on observing system behavior like timing, power consumption, or electromagnetic leaks.

These attacks are effective against poorly implemented authentication mechanisms or embedded systems like ICS/SCADA.

Incorrect Options:

B. Denial-of-service is aimed at making systems unavailable, not extracting credentials.

C. HMI-based attacks involve manipulating the human-machine interface of ICS systems.

D. Buffer overflow exploits memory handling flaws, not timing behavior.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 20: Cryptography

Section: “Cryptanalysis and Side-Channel Attacks”

Subsection: “Timing Attacks and Password Recovery”

In authentication, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) involves using more than one category of authentication factors:

Something you know (e.g., password)

Something you have (e.g., RFID badge, token)

Something you are (e.g., biometrics like fingerprints, facial recognition, gait)

In this scenario:

The RFID badge is "something you have" (a physical object).

The gait recognition (walking pattern) captured by the camera is a biometric—"something you are" (a physical characteristic).

Together, these two methods represent two distinct authentication factors, thereby implementing true multi-factor authentication.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 5: System Hacking

Topic: Authentication Mechanisms

Quote:

“Examples of multi-factor authentication include combining biometrics (something you are) with a smart card or badge (something you have). Gait recognition is considered a behavioral biometric and falls under ‘something you are’.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A. Incorrect — gait and RFID represent two separate factor types, not one.

C. No evidence in the scenario supports high false positives.

D. Gait analysis is a recognized biometric method and can be used for identification.

One of the most important actions to secure a web server from common threats is to regularly update and patch the server software. This includes the operating system, the web server software, the database software, and any other applications or frameworks that run on the server. Updating and patching the server software can fix known vulnerabilities, bugs, or errors that could be exploited by attackers to compromise the server or the website. Failing to update and patch the server software can expose the server to common attacks, such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, remote code execution, denial-of-service, etc.

Installing a web application firewall, limiting the number of concurrent connections to the server, and encrypting the company’s website with SSL/TLS are also good practices to secure a web server, but they are not as critical as updating and patching the server software. A web application firewall can filter and block malicious requests, but it cannot prevent attacks that exploit unpatched vulnerabilities in the server software. Limiting the number of concurrent connections to the server can prevent overload and improve performance, but it cannot stop attackers from sending malicious requests or payloads. Encrypting the company’s website with SSL/TLS can protect the data in transit between the server and the client, but it cannot protect the data at rest on the server or prevent attacks that target the server itself.

Therefore, the priority action to secure a web server from common threats is to regularly update and patch the server software.