Pass the OCEG GRC GRCA Questions and answers with ValidTests

Follow-up on the implementation status of recommendations by assurance personnel is known as Follow-Up by Independent Assurance. This process involves independent assurance providers reviewing the actions taken to address the recommendations and verifying that they have been implemented effectively. This follow-up ensures that issues identified during the assessment have been resolved and that improvements have been made.References:

IIA Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing

ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

Compliance is defined as a measure of the degree to which obligations and requirements are addressed. It involves adhering to laws, regulations, policies, and standards that are relevant to the organization. Compliance ensures that the organization meets its legal and ethical obligations, thereby avoiding legal penalties, reputational damage, and operational disruptions. Effective compliance programs involve continuous monitoring, training, and auditing to ensure all requirements are met and maintained.References:

ISO 19600:2014 - Compliance management systems - Guidelines

NIST SP 800-37 Rev. 2 - Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations

The best sequence of testing is to conduct control testing first and then substantive testing. This approach ensures that the effectiveness of internal controls is evaluated before examining the details of transactions and data. By testing controls first, assurance providers can determine if controls are reliable and can potentially reduce the extent of substantive testing needed. Effective controls can provide confidence that transactions and data are accurate, reducing the need for extensive substantive testing.References:

AICPA Auditing Standards

ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

The key steps in the Assessment Process are Plan, Perform, Report, and Follow-Up. These steps provide a structured approach to conducting assessments, ensuring thorough evaluation and continuous improvement:

Plan:Define the scope, objectives, and methodology.

Perform:Execute the assessment according to the plan.

Report:Document findings and provide recommendations.

Follow-Up:Monitor the implementation of recommendations and improvements.

These steps help ensure assessments are systematic, objective, and effective in identifying areas for improvement.References:

ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework

GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) integrates multiple disciplines to create a cohesive approach to managing an organization's overall governance, risk management, and compliance with regulations. The integrated disciplines include:

Audit and Assurance: Ensuring internal controls are effective and compliance with laws and policies.

Governance and Oversight: Establishing frameworks and policies to guide the organization.

Strategy and Performance Management: Aligning risk management and compliance with strategic objectives.

Quality and Conformance: Ensuring products/services meet regulatory and customer standards.

Information Privacy and Security: Protecting sensitive data and ensuring information security.

Compliance and Ethics: Adhering to legal requirements and promoting ethical behavior.

Risk and Decision Support: Identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks to support decision-making.

The integration of these disciplines ensures a comprehensive approach to managing risks and achieving organizational objectives.

References:

OCEG GRC Capability Model (Red Book)

ISO 31000:2018 - Risk management – Guidelines

COSO Enterprise Risk Management – Integrating with Strategy and Performance

The level of assurance risk targeted by an assessment should be driven by the assessment's purpose and parameters. Not all assessments require very low or zero assurance risk; some may appropriately target higher levels of assurance risk depending on the context and objectives. The purpose and scope of the assessment, as well as the risk tolerance of the organization, will dictate the acceptable level of assurance risk. This approach ensures that resources are allocated efficiently and that the assessment is tailored to the specific needs and risks of the organization.References:

ISO 31000:2018 - Risk management – Guidelines

COSO Enterprise Risk Management – Integrating with Strategy and Performance

Performance is most associated with a "measure of how well we are addressing opportunities." Performance management focuses on setting goals, monitoring progress, and evaluating outcomes to ensure that an organization is effectively taking advantage of opportunities to achieve its objectives. It involves measuring and managing activities that lead to improved efficiency, effectiveness, and innovation. By addressing opportunities, organizations can enhance their performance and create value.References:

ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems – Requirements

Balanced Scorecard Institute - Performance Management Framework

Including the personnel who perform the work being assessed in the planning process is important because they possess valuable insights and knowledge about the processes and controls in place. Their involvement helps to ensure that the assessment is accurately scoped and relevant parameters are set. They can provide context and clarify operational details, contributing to a more effective and targeted assessment. Moreover, their engagement can foster a cooperativeenvironment and facilitate smoother assessment execution.References:

ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework

Follow-up on the implementation status of recommendations based on high priority, due or overdue items, or time-sensitive items is known as Follow-Up by Targeted Review. This approach focuses on areas that are of critical importance or where timely implementation is essential. It helps ensure that the most significant risks are addressed promptly and that any delays in addressing recommendations are identified and managed.References:

IIA Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing

COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework

A written report by an assurance professional is most likely to be the most objective source of evidence. Assurance professionals are trained to conduct evaluations impartially, following standardized methodologies and best practices. Their reports are based on documented evidence and systematic analysis, ensuring a high level of objectivity and reliability compared to vocalized statements or reports by process owners, who may have biases or conflicts of interest.References:

IIA Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing

ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems