Pass the Salesforce Developer Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect Questions and answers with ValidTests

A virtual Kanban board tool is a good way to increase transparency and collaboration among agile development teams, as it allows them to visualize their work, track their progress, and identify any bottlenecks or issues. A daily stand-up meeting, a daily email, or a shared spreadsheet are not as effective or efficient as a Kanban board tool.

Creating an unmanaged package of the app and deploying it in NTO’s org is the best option for having ETO’s Sales Optimization app in NTO’s Salesforce org in the shortest possible time. An unmanaged package is a collection of components that can be easily installed and customized in another org. Unlike a managed package, an unmanaged package does not have any restrictions or dependencies on the source org, and does not require a security review or approval from Salesforce. Creating a managed package, creating users in ETO’s org, or building the app from scratch in NTO’s org are not as fast or efficient as creating an unmanaged package.

The three benefits of using a partner development org over an individual development org in this scenario are:

Partner development org has a greater number of licenses available for the team. This means that the developers can test their app with different user profiles and permissions, and also invite beta testers to provide feedback2.

Partner development org offers higher API limit. This means that the developers can use more API calls to integrate their app with external systems or services, and also leverage the Salesforce APIs to automate their development and deployment processes2.

Partner development org offers more storage. This means that the developers can store more data and files in their org, and also use more features and components that require storage, such as Big Objects, Platform Events, or Lightning Web Components2.

The other options are not benefits of using a partner development org over an individual development org in this scenario, because:

Only partner development org supports managed beta testing. This is not true, as both partner development org and individual development org can create and distribute managed beta packages3.

Partner development org never expires. This is also not true, as partner development orgs have a 12-month expiration period, which can be extended by request

 Cross-site scripting is the most common reason that the prospect AppExchange products fail the security review. Cross-site scripting (XSS) is a type of web application vulnerability that allows an attacker to inject malicious code into a web page that is viewed by other users. XSS can compromise the security and privacy of the users, as well as the functionality and performance of the application. Salesforce has strict security standards and policies for AppExchange products, and any product that has XSS vulnerabilities will not pass the security review. CRUD/FLS, session hacking, and SOQL injection are also security issues that can affect AppExchange products, but they are not as common or severe as XSS.

Refreshing all non-preview sandboxes during the release preview window is the best way to handle the situation of having a mix of preview and non-preview instances for the release of a major project. A release preview window is a period of time before a Salesforce seasonal release, where the customers can test their applications and integrations in a sandbox that has the same version as the upcoming release. By refreshing all non-preview sandboxes during this window, the architect can ensure that all the sandboxes are aligned with the same version and avoid any conflicts or errors during the deployment. Refreshing the sandboxes when the release management team has time, mixing instance types, or contacting support to rollback the release are not good practices, as they can cause inconsistency, confusion, or disruption in the release process.

D is the correct answer, as automated testing is the best approach to mitigate the risk of bugs being inadvertently introduced to production. Automated testing can help to ensure that the code meets the quality and functionality standards, as well as detect and prevent any errors or regressions before deploying to production. A is incorrect, as user acceptance testing is not enough to mitigate the risk of bugs, as it depends on the manual testing and feedback of the end users, which can be subjective and incomplete. B is incorrect, as the use of an agile methodology is not directly related to mitigating the risk of bugs, as it is a way of managing the project scope, requirements, and delivery. C is incorrect, as requirements traceability is not directly related to mitigating the risk of bugs, as it is a way of tracking the requirements and their fulfillment. You can learn more about this topic in the Testing Strategies module on Trailhead.

 To reduce defects, the architect should recommend increasing the code coverage to 95% and adding more details to the acceptance criteria. Increasing the code coverage can help ensure that the code is thoroughly tested and meets the quality standards. Adding more details to the acceptance criteria can help clarify the requirements and expectations for the functionality. Using the test script to define the test classes or having the test analyst create the test classes are not good practices, as they can introduce errors and inconsistencies in the testing process.

Multiple triggers on the same object can cause conflicts and performance issues. Multiple unit test failures can indicate poor code quality and lack of maintenance. Duplicated logic across Visualforce pages and Apex classes can lead to inconsistency and redundancy.

Active Process Builders are configuration items that should be covered by executable tests, as they can have complex logic and actions that affect the behavior and performance of the application. Validation Rules, Workflow Rules, and Case Assignment Rules are also configuration items, but they are simpler and less likely to cause errors or conflicts. Therefore, they can be verified by manual testing or declarative tools.

 In the change set model, the source of truth is a combination of the metadata already in the environment and the content of your change set, as you stated correctly. However, a change set cannot be retrieved from the developer’s workbench as a package, nor can it be pushed into the version control system. Change sets are only available within the Salesforce UI, and they are not compatible with version control systems. In the package development model, the source of truth is the metadata in the package project, which makes it easy to integrate to a version control system, as you stated correctly. Additionally, in the package development model, the best practice is to consider the dependencies and build them into the package so it can be deployed in any other target orgs. This ensures that the package is self-contained and does not rely on external components that may not exist in the target org.