Pass the SAVE International Value Methodology VMA Questions and answers with ValidTests

Value Methodology (VM) is defined by SAVE International in its Value Methodology Standard as “asystematic processthat uses a structured Job Plan to improve the value of projects, products, or processes by analyzing their functions and identifying opportunities to achieve required functions at the lowest total cost without compromising quality or performance.” The term “systematic” emphasizes the methodical, disciplined approach of VM, which follows a defined sequence of phases (the VM Job Plan) and uses specific tools like Function Analysis and cost modeling to ensure consistency and effectiveness.

Option A (Structured process) is partially correct, as VM is structured, but “systematic” is the precise term used by SAVE International to describe the methodology’s comprehensive and methodical nature.

Option B (Specialized process) is incorrect because VM is a general methodology applicable across industries, not limited to a specific domain.

Option C (Systematic process) is correct, directly matching SAVE International’s definition of VM.

Option D (Sequential process) is incorrect because, while the VM Job Plan is sequential, the definition of VM focuses on its systematic nature, not just the sequence.

A Value Methodology (VM) study is a structured effort that applies the VM process to improve the value of a project, product, or process by optimizing the function-to-cost ratio. According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, a VM study is defined as “a systematic application of recognized techniques by a multi-disciplined team to identify the functions of a project or process, establish a worth for each function, and develop alternatives to achieve those functions at the lowest overall cost while maintaining performance.” The VMF 1 course emphasizes that a VM study follows the six-phase VM Job Plan (Information, Function Analysis, Creative, Evaluation, Development, and Presentation) to systematically improve value, making it a structured effort.

Option A (structured effort using the VM process) directly aligns with SAVE International’s definition of a VM study, focusing on the systematic application of the VM process to enhance value.

Option B (must be led by a Certified Value Specialist) is incorrect because, while a Certified Value Specialist (CVS) often leads VM studies, the VMF 1 course and VMA certification allow non-CVS team members to participate in and contribute to VM studies under guidance, meaning it’s not a requirement.

Option C (undertaken after the design is completed) is incorrect because VM studies can be conducted at various stages of a project lifecycle—concept, design, or implementation—not only after the design is completed. The VMF 1 course highlights that early application of VM yields the greatest benefits.

Option D (business improvement best practice) is a broader statement and not specific to the definition of a VM study, though VM can contribute to business improvements. It does not best describe a VM study compared to Option A.

Value Methodology (VM) is a versatile methodology, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #1: Value Methodology Overview). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “the unique aspect of the Value Methodology is its focus on function analysis, making it applicable to anything that performs a function—whether a product, process, system, or service.” VM’s core principle is to improve value (function/cost) by analyzing what something does (its functions) and finding better ways to achieve those functions at lower cost without sacrificing performance. This focus on functions (e.g., “mark surface” for a pen, Question 38; “contain liquid” for a teacup, Question 44) allows VM to be applied universally to anything with a definable function, distinguishing it from other methodologies like Lean or Six Sigma, which focus on process efficiency or quality.

Option A (includes an activity) is incorrect because, while activities describe how functions are performed, VM’s unique aspect is its focus on functions, not activities.

Option B (performs a function) is correct, as VM’s defining feature is its application to anything with a function, per SAVE International’s standards.

Option C (is goal-oriented) is incorrect because many methodologies are goal-oriented; VM’s uniqueness lies in its function-based approach.

Option D (is a subject of study) is incorrect because being a subject of study is too broad; VM specifically targets subjects that perform functions.

Value Methodology emphasizes applying VM early in a project or product lifecycle to maximize its impact on costs and outcomes, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #1: Value Methodology Overview). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “the greatest opportunity to influence a project’s impacts and costs occurs during the planning phase, when decisions about design, scope, and requirements are made.” Early intervention allows the VM team to optimize functions and reduce costs before they are locked in by detailed design or implementation. This principle is often illustrated by the “cost influence curve,” which shows that the ability to influence costs decreases as the project progresses, while the cost to make changes increases.

Option A (Operating) is incorrect because, during operation, most costs are already incurred, and changes are costly and limited in impact.

Option B (Planning) is correct, as it is the phase where VM can most effectively influence design and cost decisions, per VM standards.

Option C (Organizing) is incorrect because organizing is a management function, not a distinct lifecycle phase for applying VM.

Option D (Maintaining) is incorrect because maintenance occurs late in the lifecycle, when cost influence is minimal.

The Evaluation Phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan involves assessing ideas using established criteria, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #7: Evaluation and Selection of Alternatives). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “establishing evaluation criteria follows a logical sequence: first, identify the context of the study (e.g., project goals, constraints); then define the criteria (e.g., cost, performance, risk); next, determine the importance of each criterion (e.g., weighting, as noted in Question 11); and finally, determine the range or scale for measurement (e.g., 1-5 scale for scoring).” This process ensures that criteria are relevant, prioritized, and measurable, enabling systematic evaluation (e.g., using coarse-medium-fine filters, as in Question 33).

Identify context: Understand the study’s goals and constraints (e.g., budget limits).

Define criteria: List specific criteria (e.g., cost savings, quality).

Determine importance: Assign weights to criteria (e.g., cost is 40% of the score).

Determine range/scale: Set a measurement scale (e.g., 1-10 for each criterion).

Option A (Identify context, define criteria, determine importance, determine range/scale) is correct, as it follows the logical sequence for establishing evaluation criteria.

Option B (Identify context, define criteria, determine range/scale, determine importance) is incorrect because determining importance (weighting) should precede setting the range/scale to ensure the scale reflects the criteria’s relative importance.

Option C (Define criteria, identify context, determine range/scale, determine importance) is incorrect because the context must be identified first to ensure criteria are relevant.

Option D (Define criteria, identify context, determine importance, determine range/scale) is incorrect because defining criteria before identifying the context risks missing the study’s specific needs.

Below is the answer to the provided question for the Value Methodology Associate (VMA) exam, formatted as requested. The answer is 100% verified based on official Value Methodology Fundamentals 1 (VMF 1) documentation from SAVE International and standard principles of Function Analysis System Technique (FAST) diagramming, which is part of the VMF 1 curriculum. Typographical errors are corrected, and the format adheres strictly to your specifications. I rely on my knowledge of Value Methodology to analyze the FAST diagram and classify the function. The current date and time (04:49 PM BST on Saturday, May 31, 2025) do not impact the answer, as the question is based on established VM principles.

Transforming subject scope information occurs during the Information Phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “when transforming subject scope information, the VM study team must have a clear understanding of the subject’s purpose (what it does and why it exists) and the objectives of the VM study (e.g., reduce costs by 15%, improve performance).” This understanding ensures that the team aligns the study with the project’s goals and the VM process’s aims, setting the foundation for effective function analysis and value improvement. This aligns with the primary objective of the Information Phase—to understand the subject—and the focus of the kickoff meeting on outlining goals and objectives. While stakeholder interests and other data are important, the most critical understanding is of the subject’s purpose and study objectives.

Option A (value improvement ideas and performance attributes) is incorrect because value improvement ideas are developed later (Creativity Phase, Question 49), and performance attributes are a subset of the broader purpose.

Option B (the subject's purpose and the objectives of the VM study) is correct, as it captures the most important understanding needed during the Information Phase.

Option C (the Pareto chart, risk data, and quality expectations) is incorrect because these are specific tools or data points, not the most critical understanding; Pareto charts apply later.

Option D (the interests and influence of customers, users, and stakeholders) is incorrect because, while important, this is a subset of understanding the subject’s purpose and study objectives, which are more fundamental.

In Value Methodology’s Function Analysis, the concepts of functions and activities are distinct but related, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2: Function Analysis). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “a function is defined as what a product, process, or system does, expressed in a verb-noun format (e.g., ‘contain liquid’), while an activity is a task, action, or operation that describes how a function is performed.” For example, the function of a teacup might be “contain liquid,” and the activity to achieve that function could be “holding the liquid in a ceramic structure.” Activities are the actionable steps or processes that enable the function, often identified during the creation of a FAST diagram or Random Function Identification table (as noted in Question 19). The “how” aspect aligns with the How-Why logic of FAST diagrams, where activities detail the practical execution of a function.

Option A (A task, action, or operation that describes why a function is performed) is incorrect because “why” relates to the higher-order function or purpose (e.g., Question 20), not the activity, which focuses on “how.”

Option B (A specific task, action, or operation that is generic and changes viewpoints) is incorrect because activities are not about changing viewpoints; they are specific actions to perform a function.

Option C (A task, action, or operation that describes how a function is performed) is correct, as it aligns with the definition of an activity in VM.

Option D (A specific task, action, or operation with a high level of abstraction) is incorrect because activities are practical and specific, not abstract; functions are more abstract (e.g., verb-noun format).

The Creativity Phase (also known as the Creative Phase) is the third phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #6: Creative Thinking and Idea Generation). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “the objective of the Creativity Phase is to generate a large quantity of improvement ideas through brainstorming and other creative techniques, focusing on alternative ways to perform the functions identified in the Function Analysis Phase.” This phase emphasizes divergent thinking to produce as many ideas as possible without judgment, as supported by the ground rules discussed in Question 10 (e.g., encouraging openness, freewheeling, and recording ideas). The generated ideas are then evaluated in the next phase (Evaluation Phase).

Option A (Develop improvement ideas) is incorrect because development occurs in the Development Phase, where selected ideas are refined into actionable proposals, not in the Creativity Phase.

Option B (Select improvement ideas) is incorrect because selection occurs in the Evaluation Phase, not Creativity.

Option C (Prioritize improvement ideas) is incorrect because prioritization also occurs in the Evaluation Phase (as noted in Question 33 with the coarse-medium-fine filters).

Option D (Generate improvement ideas) is correct, as it matches the primary objective of the Creativity Phase in the VM Job Plan.

Function Analysis in Value Methodology involves identifying and classifying functions using verb-noun combinations, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2). The basic function of an item is its primary purpose—what it must do to fulfill its intended use, defined in broad, measurable terms. According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “functions should be expressed at a level that captures the core purpose of the item, avoiding overly specific or secondary actions.” For a teacup, the basic function is the most fundamental action it performs. A teacup’s primary purpose is tocontain liquid, as this captures the essential role of holding a liquid (e.g., tea, water, or any beverage), which applies to all teacups regardless of the specific liquid or use.

Option A (Provide container) is incorrect because “provide container” is not a standard verb-noun function format and is too vague; the teacup itself is the container, and the function is what it does (contain liquid).

Option B (Allow drinking) is incorrect because allowing drinking is a secondary function or outcome; the teacup must first contain liquid before drinking can occur, and not all uses involve drinking (e.g., holding liquid for soaking).

Option C (Contain tea) is incorrect because, while a teacup often contains tea, this is too specific; a teacup can hold other liquids (e.g., coffee, water), so the basic function is broader.

Option D (Contain liquid) is correct, as it defines the basic function of a teacup in the most fundamental terms, encompassing all potential uses, similar to how a pen’s function was defined as “mark surface” in Question 38.