Pass the Scaled Agile Certification SAFe-SGP Questions and answers with ValidTests

An attribute of a high-performing team is healthy conflict. Healthy conflict means that the team members are able to express their diverse opinions, perspectives, and ideas in a constructive and respectful way. They also listen to each other, seek to understand different viewpoints, and resolve disagreements through consensus or compromise. Healthy conflict fosters creativity, innovation, and learning within the team, and helps the team to deliver better solutions that meet the customer and stakeholder needs12.

1: Creating High Performing Teams of Teams - Scaled Agile Framework 2: 4 Qualities of High Performing Teams You Must Know! | Turing

According to the Government Article on the Scaled Agile Framework website, tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting and calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries are two recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. The article states that “To track expenditures, the Program Backlog can be tagged with funding metadata for future reporting. Additionally, a fixed cost labor cost per ART can be calculated based on actual salaries. This simplifies the tracking of labor costs and allows for more accurate forecasting.” Therefore, the correct answers are A, tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting, and E, calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. Organizing ARTs by funding classification (B) is not a recommended practice, as it may create silos and reduce collaboration across ARTs. Including a fiduciary expert in backlog refinement © is not a necessary step, as the backlog items should be prioritized based on value and not on cost. Using charge codes assigned by each program (D) is not a simple or effective way to track expenditures, as it may introduce overhead and complexity.

According to the Adapting Governance Practices to Support Agility and Lean Flow of Value article on the Scaled Agile Framework website, the Incremental Capability Review is an objective-based progress review that replaces the traditional phase-gate reviews. The article states that “The Incremental Capability Review (ICR) is a new governance practice that provides a more effective way to measure progress and manage risk. It is based on the principle of objective evidence of working systems rather than subjective opinions and documentation. The ICR is a lightweight, collaborative, and transparent review process that aligns with the PI cadence and events. It leverages the System Demo, Inspect and Adapt, and PI Planning to provide frequent and incremental checks of the solution’s fitness for purpose and compliance with relevant standards and regulations.” Therefore, the correct answer is A, it is an objective-based progress review. The other options are not accurate, as the ICR is not the default for phase-gate reviews, it is not a document-based progress measure, and it does not ensure manual review of processes.