Pass the WGU Courses and Certificates Managing-Cloud-Security Questions and answers with ValidTests

A loss of policy control is a key risk when using a community cloud compared to a private cloud. Managing Cloud principles explain that community clouds are shared by multiple organizations with common objectives, compliance needs, or industry requirements.

Because governance is shared across participants, individual organizations may have reduced ability to enforce customized security policies, configurations, or controls. Policy decisions often require consensus, which can limit flexibility and slow response to emerging risks.

Private clouds provide full control over governance, security policies, and configurations. The other options are not inherent risks of community cloud models. Therefore, loss of policy control is the correct answer.

A Type 1 hypervisor provides the most secure foundation and smallest attack footprint for virtual servers. Managing Cloud documentation explains that Type 1 hypervisors run directly on the host hardware without an underlying operating system.

By eliminating the host OS layer, Type 1 hypervisors reduce attack surface and improve isolation between virtual machines. This architecture enhances performance, stability, and security, making it the preferred choice for enterprise and cloud environments.

Type 2 hypervisors run on top of a host operating system, increasing complexity and vulnerability exposure. Application isolation and virtualization do not provide the same foundational security. Therefore, a Type 1 hypervisor is the correct choice.

A CCSP practitioner is the subject matter expert relied upon to draft policies related to an organization’s cloud operations. Managing Cloud principles explain that cloud security specialists possess technical, architectural, and governance expertise specific to cloud environments.

CCSP practitioners understand shared responsibility models, cloud risk management, identity and access controls, data protection, and compliance requirements. This expertise enables them to develop practical and effective cloud-specific security policies.

Attorneys provide legal guidance, risk management supports analysis, and senior management approves policies but does not draft them. Therefore, a CCSP practitioner is the correct answer.

In a standard tokenization workflow, once the tokenization server generates the token, the next immediate step is for the tokenization server to return the token to the requesting application. Managing Cloud principles describe tokenization as a process where sensitive data is replaced with a non-sensitive token that has no exploitable meaning outside the tokenization system.

After the sensitive data is securely transmitted to the tokenization server and the token is generated, the application must receive that token so it can continue normal processing without handling the original sensitive value. The return of the token enables the application to complete transactions, store references, or perform business operations without exposing sensitive data.

The other options represent steps that occur either before token generation or later in the workflow. Data must be sent to the tokenization server and sensitive data must be generated before a token can be created. Storing the token occurs after the application receives it. Therefore, returning the token to the application is the correct immediate next step.

Securing the hypervisor is the primary security measure that controls virtualization in the cloud. Managing Cloud principles explain that the hypervisor is the foundational component that enables multiple virtual machines to share the same physical hardware.

If the hypervisor is compromised, all hosted workloads are at risk. Therefore, securing the hypervisor through hardening, access control, patching, and monitoring is critical to maintaining isolation between virtual machines and preventing privilege escalation.

Monitoring and logging provide visibility, dedicated hosting reduces shared risk, and managing image assets supports consistency, but none directly control virtualization. Therefore, securing the hypervisor is the correct answer.

Risks resulting from an unforeseen event cannot be fully highlighted at the outset of a cloud services contract. Managing Cloud principles explain that contracts can address known risks, anticipated changes, and planned lifecycle events, but they cannot predict all future incidents.

Unforeseen events may include unexpected geopolitical changes, novel cyber threats, global outages, or extraordinary disasters. While contracts may include force majeure clauses or general risk language, the specific nature and impact of such events cannot be precisely defined in advance.

The introduction or retirement of technology and contract renewal changes can typically be anticipated and negotiated. Therefore, unforeseen events represent the risk that cannot be fully highlighted initially.

Before an application can store a token, it must first receive the token from the tokenization server. Managing Cloud guidance outlines that tokenization workflows follow a defined sequence: the application submits sensitive data, the tokenization server generates a token, and then the token is returned to the application.

Only after the token has been successfully returned can the application replace the original sensitive data and store the token instead. This ensures that sensitive data is not retained within the application environment, reducing exposure and simplifying compliance requirements.

The other steps occur earlier in the process. An authorized application must request tokenization, and the sensitive data must be sent to the tokenization server before a token can be generated. Therefore, the immediate step before storing the token is the tokenization server returning the token to the application.

Backup generators are an appropriate countermeasure for mitigating the risk of a power outage at a cloud service provider. Managing Cloud principles explain that ensuring continuous power supply is a core responsibility of the provider’s physical infrastructure management.

Backup generators, along with redundant power feeds and uninterruptible power supplies, allow data centers to continue operating during power failures. This ensures availability, resilience, and continuity of cloud services.

Database replication and storage replication address data availability, while web application firewalls protect against application-layer attacks. They do not mitigate power loss. Therefore, backup generators are the correct countermeasure.

Multitenancy of networks is a logical design consideration when planning a data center. Managing Cloud principles explain that logical considerations focus on how systems, networks, and services are structured and interact, rather than physical infrastructure components.

Multitenancy requires logical separation of tenants to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data. This includes network segmentation, virtual LANs, access controls, and isolation mechanisms that prevent one tenant from accessing another tenant’s resources. Proper logical design is critical in cloud environments where multiple customers share the same physical infrastructure.

The other options represent non-logical considerations. Heating and cooling and utility power availability are physical and environmental concerns, while ability for expansion relates to physical capacity planning. Therefore, multitenancy of networks is the correct logical consideration.

A Web Application Firewall (WAF) allows customers to redirect traffic as part of securing cloud-hosted applications. Managing Cloud principles explain that WAFs operate at the application layer and can inspect, filter, allow, block, or redirect HTTP and HTTPS traffic based on defined security rules.

Traffic redirection is commonly used to route suspicious or malicious requests away from protected applications, forward traffic to alternate services, or enforce secure communication paths. WAFs can also integrate with load balancers and content delivery networks to manage traffic flow efficiently while protecting applications from attacks such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and denial-of-service attempts.

The other options do not provide traffic redirection. SIEM systems aggregate and analyze logs, intrusion detection and prevention systems focus on detection and blocking, and cryptographic key management handles encryption keys. Therefore, a web application firewall is the correct answer.