Pass the APMG-International AgilePM AgilePM-Practitioner Questions and answers with ValidTests

The initial action to deal with the lack of provision of a fire escape from the upstairs of the building in Timebox B should be:

• C. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, should escalate the issue to Architecture Angels’ Senior Management Team.

This is because the lack of a fire escape is a significant safety concern that could have legal and regulatory implications. It’s important that the Senior Management Team is aware of this issue so they can make informed decisions about how to address it. The Architect, in the role of Technical Co-ordinator, is well-positioned to understand the technical implications of this issue and communicate them to the Senior Management Team.

While revising the Timebox Plans (option A) or commencing understanding and delivering the new requirement (option B) could be part of the solution, these actions should be taken after the issue has been escalated and discussed with the Senior Management Team. Escalating the issue to the Marketing Director (option D) may not be the most effective course of action, as this is primarily a technical and safety issue, not a marketing one.

In the context of Agile Project Management when developing the Solution Architecture Definition (SAD), the two statements that are appropriate are:

A. Paper-based drawings are to be used for each option being considered for the building and gardens.

C. The Architecture Angels ' Marketing Director can request a SAD to illustrate the achievability of complex elements of the solution.

Here ' s the rationale:

• A: Agile methodologies support the use of simple and understandable tools that can quickly convey ideas and be easily changed. Paper-based drawings align with this by providing a flexible and adaptable way to represent different options, which can be rapidly modified in response to feedback.

• C: It is important for the Marketing Director, who understands the market and customer needs, to request clarification on complex elements to ensure that the proposed solutions are feasible and aligned with customer expectations. This contributes to creating a solution that is viable both technically and from a business perspective.

Advise how the legislation on the transfer of data will affect the requirements and the system.

E. Business Analyst

Agree the changes needed to the corporate technical architecture with the Architecture Angels IT support team.

D. Technical Coordinator

Ensure the information security vulnerability is communicated to the AA Head Office IT Director.

A. Project Manager

Evaluate the impact of proposed security controls on the business and decide on the most suitable solution.

B. Business Sponsor

Reprioritise the requirements on the Prioritised Requirements List associated with the security issue.

C. Business Visionary

Rationale:

A Business Analyst typically has the expertise to understand and communicate how data transfer legislation impacts system requirements.

The Technical Coordinator is usually responsible for technical decisions, including those that impact the technical architecture, and would work closely with the IT support team to agree on changes.

The Project Manager should ensure that key information, such as security vulnerabilities, is communicated to senior management, in this case, the IT Director.

The Business Sponsor, who is ultimately responsible for the project from a business perspective, would evaluate the impact of security measures on the business.

The Business Visionary is often tasked with understanding the strategic view of the project requirements and would be suited to reprioritize requirements, especially those with significant implications like security issues.

For each action in Column 1, here is the iterative development activity that the action represents from Column 2:

The Solution Development Team cleared and prepared the area, ready for the bar infrastructure to be installed.

B. Action

The Gardener decided the order in which the flowers would be planted in the borders and jotted it down in a notebook.

A. Thought

Before the Solution Development Team built the infrastructure for the bar area, the Architect pointed out what was required.

C. Conversation

The Architect checked with the decorators that tasks had been completed to a satisfactory standard, and agreed a list of items that needed further coats of paint or cleaning up.

C. Conversation

The Gardener began planting the borders and has placed an order for further bulbs to complete this task.

B. Action

In the context of Agile Project Management when developing the Prioritised Requirements List during Feasibility, the two statements that align with Agile principles are:

B. The re-laying of the driveway and a landscaping solution should be listed as Must Have requirements.

E. Regulatory obligations associated with the redevelopment of Hoy Hall should be recorded as Must Have requirements.

Here ' s the rationale:

• B: In Agile, requirements are often categorized by priority such as " Must Have " , " Should Have " , " Could Have " , and " Won ' t Have for now " (the MoSCoW method). The re-laying of the driveway and a landscaping solution are essential for the project ' s success and thus should be classified as " Must Have " .

• E: Regulatory requirements are non-negotiable constraints that the project must adhere to. These should always be prioritized in the requirements list to ensure compliance and to avoid legal issues, making them " Must Have " items as well.