Pass the Saviynt SCIP SAVIGA-C01 Questions and answers with ValidTests

When access privileges for a specific Analytical Control are assigned using SAV Roles in Saviynt, users belonging to that role can, by default, perform the following tasks: B. View Control, Run Control, and View Analytic History of the Control. Here's a breakdown:

Saviynt's Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Saviynt uses RBAC to manage access to various features and functionalities, including Analytical Controls.

Analytical Controls: These are pre-defined or custom-built analytics reports or dashboards.

Default Permissions: When a user is granted access to an Analytical Control via an SAV Role, they typically receive a set of default permissions:

View Control: Allows the user to view the configuration and definition of the Analytical Control (e.g., the query, parameters, visualization).

Run Control: Allows the user to execute the Analytical Control and generate results.

View Analytic History: Allows the user to see the history of previous executions of the Analytical Control, including the results and timestamps.

Why These Permissions Are Important:

Transparency: Users can understand how the analytics are defined and generated.

Usability: Users can run the analytics and obtain insights.

Auditing: Users can review past results for trend analysis or investigation.

Other Options:

A. Only view the configurations of the Control: This is too restrictive; users need to be able to run the control to get value from it.

C. Only view the Analytic History of the Control: This is also too limited; users should be able to run the control and view its configuration as well.

D. View Control and Run Control: While closer, it's missing the "View Analytic History" permission, which is important for auditing and analysis.

MISCELLANEOUS

The option that cannot be regarded as a Smart Filter in Saviynt's User Manager and Service Account Campaigns is A. User's Assigned Role counts. Here's why:

Saviynt's Smart Filters: Smart Filters are pre-defined filters in Saviynt that help Certifiers quickly focus on specific access patterns or risk indicators during a certification campaign. They are designed to highlight potentially problematic or high-risk access.

Examples of Smart Filters:

B. Access with SoD Violations: This is a Smart Filter because it highlights access that violates Segregation of Duties policies, a significant risk indicator.

C. Out-of-Band Access for Entitlements: This is a Smart Filter as it identifies access that was granted outside of the normal Saviynt processes, potentially indicating a security risk.

D. Risk Level for Accounts: This is a Smart Filter because it allows Certifiers to focus on accounts with high-risk levels, which might require more scrutiny.

Why "User's Assigned Role counts" Is Not a Smart Filter:

Not a Risk Indicator: Simply knowing the number of roles assigned to a user doesn't inherently indicate a risk or a specific access pattern that requires attention. A user might have many roles legitimately, or they might have few roles but with high-risk access.

Not Actionable: This information alone doesn't provide enough context for a Certifier to make an informed decision about whether to approve or revoke access.

Alternative: While not a "Smart Filter", the number of roles assigned could be a data point displayed within the campaign, but it wouldn't be considered a pre-defined filter for highlighting risks.

=================

When Single Sign-On (SSO) is enabled in Saviynt EIC using an external Identity Provider (IdP) like Azure AD, it generally becomes the exclusive authentication method. This means users cannot use Saviynt's native authentication (i.e., logging in with a username/password stored directly within Saviynt).

Reasons for this:

Security and Centralized Control: SSO with an IdP enhances security by centralizing authentication and enforcing stronger password policies. Allowing native logins would create a potential bypass of these security measures.

User Experience: SSO provides a seamless login experience, eliminating the need for users to remember multiple credentials. Offering both SSO and native logins could lead to confusion and a less streamlined process.

Administrative Efficiency: SSO simplifies user management by delegating authentication to the IdP. Administrators don't need to manage separate user accounts and passwords within Saviynt.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: Saviynt's documentation on SSO configurations emphasizes that enabling SSO typically disables native authentication methods.

Saviynt Best Practices: Saviynt's best practices for SSO recommend enforcing SSO as the sole authentication method for improved security and user experience.

Saviynt Implementation Guides: Implementation guides for setting up SSO with various IdPs, including Azure AD, often highlight the exclusive nature of SSO authentication.

To make an application available for access requests (either self-service or requests for others), the Access Add Workflow needs to be configured within Saviynt. This workflow defines the process that governs how access to the application is granted. Here's a breakdown with Saviynt IGA references:

Saviynt's Access Request System (ARS): This is the module within Saviynt that handles access requests. The ARS relies on defined workflows to manage the approval and provisioning process.

Access Add Workflow: This specific type of workflow within Saviynt's ARS is triggered when a user requests access to an application or entitlement. It dictates the steps involved, such as:

Requester Details: Capturing information about who is requesting access.

Application/Entitlement Selection: The user selects the application (and potentially specific roles or entitlements within that application) for which they are requesting access.

Approval Routing: Defining the approval chain (e.g., manager approval, application owner approval, etc.). This is configured within the workflow using various approval activities.

Provisioning: Upon approval, the workflow can trigger automated provisioning of access to the target system (if connected integration is set up).

Saviynt's Application Onboarding: For an application to be available in the ARS, it needs to be onboarded into Saviynt. During this process, you would typically define the relevant entitlements (access rights) associated with the application.

Workflow Configuration in Saviynt: Saviynt's admin interface allows administrators to create and customize workflows using a visual designer. This includes setting up conditions, defining approval steps, and configuring actions to be taken at each stage of the workflow.

Other options:

Proposed Accounts Workflow: This is less common, often used to suggest potential accounts during the request or account creation process. It's not the primary mechanism for making an application available for access requests.

Access Remove Workflow: This workflow is used when access needs to be revoked, not granted.

Emergency Access ID Request Workflow: This workflow is specific to requesting temporary, elevated access in emergency situations. It's not the workflow for general access requests to applications.

=================

The Job responsible for configuring a dashboard (among other configurations) in a Saviynt Campaign is B. Create or Schedule Attestation Job. Here's a detailed explanation:

Saviynt's Campaigns: Campaigns in Saviynt are used for access certification, allowing reviewers (Certifiers) to review and approve or revoke user access.

Create or Schedule Attestation Job: This job is the core mechanism for creating and configuring various aspects of a campaign, including:

Campaign Scope: Defining which users, entitlements, or resources are included in the campaign.

Certifier Selection: Specifying who will be the reviewers for the campaign.

Scheduling: Setting the start and end dates for the campaign.

Notifications: Configuring email notifications for Certifiers and other stakeholders.

Dashboard Configuration: Defining the information and layout displayed on the campaign dashboard for Certifiers. This includes selecting which data points, charts, and filters are visible.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Campaign Export Job: This job is used to export campaign data, not to configure the campaign itself.

C. Campaign Import Job: This job is used to import data into a campaign, typically from an external source.

D. Upgrade Job: This job is related to upgrading the Saviynt platform, not to campaign configuration.

In summary: The "Create or Schedule Attestation Job" is the central job for setting up and configuring all aspects of a Saviynt campaign, including the dashboard that provides Certifiers with a summarized view of the certification data.

=================

When an "Add Access" task is successfully completed in Saviynt, the applicable status is typically "Provisioned." Here's a detailed explanation with Saviynt references:

Saviynt's Task Management: Saviynt uses tasks to track the progress of various operations, including access provisioning. These tasks are generated as part of workflows, such as the "Access Add Workflow."

"Add Access" Task Type: This specific task type is created when the access request is approved and the system is ready to grant the requested access to the target application.

Task Statuses in Saviynt: Saviynt uses different statuses to indicate the current state of a task. Common statuses include:

Pending: The task is waiting to be processed.

In Progress: The task is currently being executed.

Provisioned: This status signifies that the requested access has been successfully granted to the user in the target system.

Failed: The task encountered an error and could not be completed.

Manually Provisioned: The task was completed manually by an administrator, rather than through automated provisioning.

Success: While sometimes used, this status is less specific than "Provisioned" in the context of "Add Access" tasks, since it does not specify that the action completed was a provisioning action.

Active: Typically applies to accounts or users, not tasks.

Saviynt's Workflow Engine: The workflow engine in Saviynt updates the task status as it progresses through the defined steps. For connected applications, the workflow engine might directly interact with the target system's API to provision the access. Once the provisioning is successful, the status is updated to "Provisioned."

Saviynt's Audit Trails: Saviynt maintains detailed audit trails, and the task status changes are logged. This provides a clear record of when access was provisioned for a user.

Other Options:

Success: As mentioned above, this is a general status. While technically correct (the task succeeded), "Provisioned" provides more context.

Manually Provisioned: This status is only applicable if an administrator intervened and manually granted the access outside of the automated workflow.

Active: This status typically pertains to a user or account's overall status, not specifically to the completion of an "Add Access" task.

=================

Disconnected applications in Saviynt are those that do not have real-time integration with the platform for provisioning and de-provisioning users. Therefore, automated provisioning would be turned OFF for these types of applications.

Disconnected Applications: These applications typically require manual intervention or custom scripts to manage user access. Saviynt can still manage entitlements and access requests for these applications, but it doesn't directly provision or de-provision accounts.

Other Application Types:

Service Desk Application: Usually integrated with Saviynt for automated request fulfillment.

Hybrid Application: May have some level of automated provisioning, depending on the specific configuration.

Connected Application: Fully integrated with Saviynt for real-time, automated provisioning.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: The section on Application Onboarding in Saviynt's documentation explains the different application types and their integration capabilities, including the concept of disconnected applications.

The maximum file attachment limit for a request in Saviynt is typically 10. Here's an explanation:

Saviynt's Access Request System (ARS): The ARS allows users to attach files to access requests to provide supporting documentation or justification.

Attachment Limits: To prevent excessive storage usage and potential performance issues, Saviynt imposes limits on the number and size of attachments allowed per request.

Default Limit: The default maximum number of attachments allowed per request in Saviynt is generally 10.

Configuration: While 10 is the common default, it's worth noting that this limit might be configurable within the ARS settings in some Saviynt deployments. However, significantly increasing this limit could impact performance.

File Size Limit: In addition to the number of attachments, there's also usually a limit on the individual file size and the total size of all attachments combined. This is also generally configurable. These file size limits are important for maintain system stability and performance.

Error Handling: If a user attempts to exceed the attachment limit, Saviynt will typically display an error message, preventing them from submitting the request until the number of attachments is reduced.

In Saviynt's SAML 2.0 based Single Sign-On (SSO) configuration, the "SP Entity ID" uniquely identifies Saviynt as the Service Provider (SP) to the Identity Provider (IdP). The correct SSO URL structure incorporates this "SP Entity ID" within a specific path.

Saviynt's URL Structure: Saviynt's SSO URLs follow a pattern to ensure proper routing and authentication. The /ECM/saml/SSO/alias/ portion is crucial for directing SAML-based login attempts.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. https://myorg.saviyntcloud.com/ECM/saml/SSO/SaviyntSP: This URL is missing the crucial "alias" segment in the path, making it invalid for SAML SSO.

B. https://myorg.saviyntcloud.com/SaviyntSP: This URL doesn't include the necessary components for SAML-based authentication within Saviynt.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: Saviynt's official documentation on configuring SAML SSO provides details on the correct URL structure and the significance of the "SP Entity ID."

Saviynt Support: Saviynt's support resources and knowledge base articles often address issues related to SSO configuration, reinforcing the correct URL format

The connection type best suited to expose Workday reports as a data service in Saviynt is A. Workday-RAAS (Report as a Service). Here's why:

Workday-RAAS: This connection type is specifically designed to integrate with Workday's RaaS functionality. Workday RaaS allows you to expose custom reports created within Workday as web services that can be consumed by external applications like Saviynt.

Data Service for Reports: RaaS essentially turns a Workday report into a data service, making it easy to retrieve the report's data in a structured format (typically XML or JSON).

Saviynt's Integration: Saviynt's Workday-RAAS connection type is built to leverage this capability, allowing you to:

Select Workday Reports: Choose the specific Workday reports you want to integrate with.

Import Data: Import the data from those reports into Saviynt for various purposes (e.g., identity governance, access certification, analytics).

Schedule Imports: Schedule regular data imports to keep Saviynt's data synchronized with Workday.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

B. Workday-REST: While Workday has a REST API, it's more general-purpose and not specifically tailored for exposing reports as data services in the same way as RaaS.

C. Workday-OAuth: OAuth is an authorization protocol, not a connection type for retrieving report data.

D. Workday-SOAP: Workday's SOAP API is being gradually replaced by the REST API and is less focused on report data retrieval than RaaS.

=================