Pass the PMI Project-Management-Professional PMP Questions and answers with ValidTests

The project manager should compare the achieved results to the contract requirements before obtaining financial, legal, and administrative approval to close the project and transfer the liability. This is because the project manager needs to ensure that the supplier has fulfilled all the contractual obligations and delivered the agreed scope, quality, and performance standards. The project manager should also verify that the supplier has completed all the required documentation, testing, training, and warranty services. The project manager should also review the lessons learned, feedback, and satisfaction surveys from the supplier and the project team. This will help the project manager evaluate the supplier’s performance, identify any issues or disputes, and resolve them before making the final payment and closing the project. The project manager should also communicate with the supplier and the relevant stakeholders about the project closure and the transfer of liability. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 12.3.1, “Close Procurements: Inputs”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 12.3.2, “Close Procurements: Tools and Techniques”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 12.3.3, “Close Procurements: Outputs”

PMI-PBA® Guide, 1st edition, Section 6.4.1, “Evaluate Solution: Inputs”

PMI-PBA® Guide, 1st edition, Section 6.4.2, “Evaluate Solution: Tools and Techniques”

PMI-PBA® Guide, 1st edition, Section 6.4.3, “Evaluate Solution: Outputs”

The project manager should next review the quality management plan. The quality management plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how the project team will implement the quality policy and satisfy the quality requirements for the project and its deliverables1. It includes the quality standards, quality objectives, quality roles and responsibilities, quality tools and techniques, quality metrics, quality audits, and quality control and validation activities1. By reviewing the quality management plan, the project manager can identify the root cause of the quality issues, determine the corrective and preventive actions, and ensure the compliance with the quality expectations of the key stakeholder.

Option A is not the best answer because reviewing the stakeholder engagement plan is not the next thing to do. The stakeholder engagement plan is a component of the project management plan that identifies the strategies and actions required to promote productive involvement of stakeholders in project decisions and execution2. It is important to review and update the stakeholder engagement plan throughout the project, but it is not the priority when the deliverables are not functioning as expected.

Option C is not the best answer because reviewing the requirements traceability matrix is not the next thing to do. The requirements traceability matrix is a project document that links the project requirements to their origin and tracks them throughout the project life cycle3. It helps to ensure that each requirement adds business value and is aligned with the project objectives. It is useful to review the requirements traceability matrix during the project planning and monitoring, but it is not the main focus when the deliverables are not meeting the quality standards.

Option D is not the best answer because reviewing the work breakdown structure (WBS) is not the next thing to do. The WBS is a project document that decomposes the project scope into smaller, more manageable components called work packages4. It defines and organizes the project work and deliverables. It is helpful to review the WBS during the project planning and execution, but it is not the most relevant document when the deliverables are not functioning as expected. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 8.1.3.1, Quality Management Plan 2: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 13.1.3.1, Stakeholder Engagement Plan 3: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 5.2.3.1, Requirements Traceability Matrix 4: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 5.4.3.1, Work Breakdown Structure

A hybrid project is a project that combines predictive and adaptive approaches. In such a project, the project manager should ensure that the team receives continuous feedback from customers users to validate the alignment of the deliverables with the expectations. This is a key practice of agile and adaptive methods, which aim to maximize customer satisfaction and value delivery. Updating the project management plan, submitting a change request, or ensuring the team understands all additional project requirements are not steps that would prevent the misalignment of the deliverables with the expectations, but rather actions that could be taken after the problem has occurred. References: [PMI Agile Practice Guide], page 14; [PMBOK® Guide 6th Edition], page 19.

According to the PMBOK Guide, a project manager should ensure that the project team applies a long-term solution for an issue that has been resolved during the project life cycle, to prevent it from reoccurring after the project closure. This is part of the control quality process, which involves monitoring and recording the results of quality activities, and implementing corrective actions to address any quality issues. A long-term solution is one that addresses the root cause of the issue and eliminates or reduces the probability of its recurrence. A short-term solution is one that provides a temporary fix or workaround for the issue, but does not resolve the underlying problem. A short-term solution may be acceptable in some situations, but it may also create additional risks or costs in the future. Therefore, a project manager should always consider the long-term implications of any solution and choose the one that best meets the project objectives and stakeholder expectations. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 293-294, 303-304.

 According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project vision is a high-level description of the project’s purpose, scope, and objectives. It provides the direction and alignment for the project team and stakeholders. The project vision should be clear, concise, inspiring, and consistent with the organization’s strategy. When the scope has changed significantly and the product owner has been replaced multiple times, the project vision may become unclear or outdated. The team members may feel disassociated from the project and lose motivation and engagement. To ensure team alignment with the goals, the project manager should facilitate a discussion of the vision for the project, involving the new product owner and the team members. This will help to clarify the project’s value proposition, expected outcomes, and success criteria. It will also help to reestablish trust, collaboration, and commitment among the team and the product owner. Asking the new product owner to explain the importance of the project, emailing the team a detailed outline of the business requirements, or reviewing the project charter with the team are not sufficient or effective ways to ensure team alignment with the goals. These options may not address the underlying issues of the team’s disassociation, such as lack of involvement, ownership, or empowerment. They may also not reflect the current state of the project or the organization’s strategy. References: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, pages 30-31, 89-90.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should assess the situation to understand how the organization’s culture impacts the decision-making process, and coach the team toward a new model. This is because the project manager is responsible for facilitating the team’s decision-making process and ensuring that it aligns with the agile principles and values1. The project manager should also consider the following factors that may affect the team’s decision-making process2:

The level of empowerment and autonomy given to the team by the organization and the stakeholders

The degree of collaboration and communication among the team members and with other parties

The availability and quality of information and data to support the decision-making process

The complexity and uncertainty of the project environment and the product requirements

The time and resource constraints and the impact of delays on the project outcomes

The potential risks and opportunities associated with the decisions and the alternatives

The feedback and learning mechanisms to evaluate and improve the decision-making process

The project manager should coach the team toward a new model of decision-making that is more agile and adaptive, such as the following3:

Decentralized decision-making: The team members are empowered to make decisions within their scope of work and authority, without waiting for approval from higher levels of management. This can increase the team’s speed, efficiency, and ownership of the decisions.

Collaborative decision-making: The team members work together to make decisions that benefit the project and the stakeholders, rather than competing or conflicting with each other. This can enhance the team’s creativity, innovation, and quality of the decisions.

Data-driven decision-making: The team members use empirical evidence and data to support their decisions, rather than relying on assumptions or opinions. This can improve the team’s accuracy, reliability, and transparency of the decisions.

Iterative decision-making: The team members make decisions in small increments and cycles, rather than in large batches and phases. This can allow the team to adapt to changing conditions and feedback, and to deliver value early and frequently.

Value-based decision-making: The team members make decisions that maximize the value delivered to the customer and the stakeholders, rather than focusing on the cost or the schedule. This can ensure the team’s alignment with the project vision and goals.

References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.4.2.3

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.4.2.4

Decision-Making Models: Five Agile Methods to Help You

The project manager should prepare a weekly status report and share it with executive management every week to keep them informed of the project’s progress and performance. This will help to address their concerns and expectations, as well as to provide them with relevant information for decision making. The status report should include key metrics such as schedule, cost, scope, quality, risks, and issues, as well as any changes or deviations from the baseline. The project manager should also communicate the benefits and value of the agile approach, and how it aligns with the project objectives and customer needs12. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 10.4.3.1, page 387

Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 3.3, page 37

The project manager should first follow the risk response plan. The risk response plan is a component of the project management plan that describes how to implement risk responses for identified risks and opportunities1. It includes the agreed-upon actions and owners for each risk, as well as the budget, schedule, and resources allocated for the risk responses1. By following the risk response plan, the project manager can execute the appropriate actions to minimize the impact of the delay on the critical path activity and the project objectives.

Option B is not the best answer because using the contingency fund is not the first thing to do. The contingency fund is a reserve amount of money or time that is set aside to cover the cost or time impact of known risks2. It is part of the risk response plan, and it should be used only after the risk response actions have been implemented and the residual risk impact has been assessed3.

Option C is not the best answer because preparing a change request is not the first thing to do. A change request is a formal proposal to modify any document, deliverable, or baseline of the project. It should be prepared only after the risk response actions have been implemented and the impact of the delay on the project scope, schedule, cost, or quality has been analyzed.

Option D is not the best answer because updating the risk register is not the first thing to do. The risk register is a project document that records the details of all identified risks, including their description, category, probability, impact, response strategy, and status. It should be updated only after the risk response actions have been implemented and the outcome of the risk response has been evaluated. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 11.1.3.1, Risk Response Plan 2: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 6.5.2.3, Contingency Reserve 3: PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 11.5.3.1, Implement Risk Responses : PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 4.6.3.1, Change Requests : PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 4.6.3.2, Change Control Tools : PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 11.2.3.1, Risk Register : PMBOK Guide, 7th Edition, Section 11.6.3.1, Monitor Risks

According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 4.6.2, the project manager should assess the impact of any requested changes on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, risks, and stakeholder engagement. The project manager should also follow the established change management process, which usually involves submitting the change request to the CCB for approval or rejection. The CCB is a group of stakeholders who have the authority to review and approve changes to the project baselines. The project manager should not implement the new features without the CCB’s approval, nor reject them outright, as this could damage the relationship with the sponsor and other stakeholders. The project manager should also not add the new features just to please the sponsor, as this could lead to scope creep and gold plating, which are practices of adding unnecessary or unapproved features that increase the project cost and risk without adding value. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 4.6.2, page 121-122

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition

PMP Exam Content Outline

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should use appropriate conflict resolution techniques to manage conflicts among project stakeholders. One of the techniques is collaborating/problem-solving, which involves finding a mutually beneficial solution that satisfies all parties. This technique requires a high level of trust and cooperation, and may involve a face-to-face meeting to discuss the issues and options. The other options are either too passive, too formal, or too premature for resolving the conflict. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 157-158, section 8.3.2.2.

The project manager should follow the Monitor and Control Project Work process, which involves tracking, reviewing, and reporting the progress and performance of the project, as well as managing changes and issues that arise. One of the main outputs of this process is the work performance reports, which provide information on the project status, progress, forecasts, issues, risks, and corrective actions. The project manager should use these reports to communicate with the relevant stakeholders and manage their expectations regarding the impact of the component delay on the project schedule. The project manager should also assess the component delay and determine the appropriate response strategy, such as requesting a change, implementing a contingency plan, or escalating the issue to senior management. The project manager should not perform a detailed analysis of the release content for each component of the solution (B), as this is not relevant to the current issue and may waste time and resources. The project manager should not propose a new design of the solution to replace the external component with an internal one ©, as this may introduce new risks, costs, and scope changes that may not be feasible or acceptable to the stakeholders. The project manager should not ask for expedited delivery of the component to mitigate the risk of schedule delays (D), as this may not be possible or realistic, and may also increase the cost and quality risks of the project. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 105-106, 112-113, 123-124

PMP Exam Content Outline, 2020, pages 9-10, 13-14

PMP Sample Test Questions, 2019, page 5

According to the PMBOK Guide, a retrospective meeting is a process of reviewing and analyzing the past performance of a project team, especially in an agile or hybrid environment. The purpose of the retrospective meeting is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the team, the lessons learned, and the improvement actions for the future. The project manager should facilitate the retrospective meeting and encourage the team to share their feedback, opinions, and suggestions. If the project team’s performance has declined for the last three iterations, the project manager should focus on remediation not merely on correcting symptoms. This means that the project manager should help the team to find the root causes of the performance issues, and implement effective solutions that address the underlying problems, not just the superficial symptoms. For example, if the team is facing communication challenges, the project manager should not just provide more communication tools, but also improve the communication processes, protocols, and skills of the team. Focusing on remediation not merely on correcting symptoms will help the team to improve their performance and prevent recurrence of the same issues. Comparing the team’s performance against other project teams is not a good option, as it may demoralize the team, create unhealthy competition, and ignore the unique context and challenges of each project. Identifying potential failure points based on the iteration workload is a useful technique, but it is not enough to improve the team’s performance. The project manager should also analyze the actual failure points and the reasons behind them, and take corrective and preventive actions accordingly. Motivating the team to perform better is a desirable outcome, but it is not a specific action that the project manager should do. The project manager should use various motivational techniques, such as recognition, rewards, empowerment, and feedback, to inspire the team and enhance their morale and engagement. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18-19, 686-687, 723-724.

Agile project management welcomes changes in scope, but it also requires a trade-off of other items in the product backlog. The product owner owns the backlog and has to be able to make these decisions regarding trade-offs between stories and features. The project manager should guide the agile team to add the new scope to the product backlog and prioritize it according to the project goals and customer value. The project manager should also conduct regular backlog grooming sessions to assess and update the backlog items. The new scope should not be added to the current sprint, unless it is small enough to be completed by the time the sprint ends and does not affect the sprint goals. Creating a parallel sprint, pausing the sprint, or moderating the expectations for sprint quality are not agile practices and would compromise the project’s agility, quality, and delivery. References:

How Agile Addresses Changing Project Scope

Agile Twists & Turns: How to Handle Scope Changes

How to change your project’s scope (the right way)

Agile Scope Management: Refactor Your PMP

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should be involved in the procurement process to ensure that the project requirements are clearly defined and communicated to the potential suppliers1. The project manager should also verify that the project objectives are aligned with the business needs and the expectations of the stakeholders before approving an agreement2. Therefore, the best option is to ensure that the requirements for the project are understood and that the objectives are verified before approval of an agreement. Option B is incorrect because informing the project sponsor that there cannot be any changes to the scope of the project is unrealistic and may not account for the possible risks and uncertainties that may arise during the project execution3. Option C is incorrect because notifying the project sponsor that the project manager cannot be involved in the agreement negotiation process is not a proactive or collaborative approach, and may result in a poor or unsuitable agreement for the project. Option D is incorrect because asking the project sponsor to involve the legal department in the negotiation for the project agreement is not the responsibility of the project manager, and may not address the issue of the project manager’s participation in the procurement process. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.1.3.1, p. 465 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 4.1.3.1, p. 89 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 5.6.3.1, p. 161 : PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.2.3.1, p. 473 : PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.2.3.2, p. 474

According to the PMBOK® Guide, integrated change control is the process of reviewing all change requests, approving changes, and managing changes to deliverables, organizational process assets, project documents, and the project management plan. It also involves communicating the decisions on the change requests to the relevant stakeholders. The project manager should evaluate the proposed change with integrated change control to determine its impact on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, risk, and benefits. The project manager should also discuss the change with the project sponsor, who is the person or group that provides resources and support for the project and is accountable for enabling success. The project sponsor can help the project manager to obtain approval for the change, resolve conflicts, and align the change with the strategic objectives of the organization. References:

PMBOK® Guide, Seventh Edition, Section 8.2.2.1, “Integrated Change Control”

PMBOK® Guide, Seventh Edition, Section 4.4.3.2, “Project Sponsor”

 According to the PMBOK Guide, an agile project is an adaptive life cycle project that follows an iterative and incremental approach. In an agile project, the project manager facilitates collaboration and empowers the team to deliver value. When an unidentified risk becomes an issue, the project manager should help the team review the project approach and initiate the corrective actions to address the issue and prevent recurrence. Asking the sponsor to approve an additional iteration or money is not agile, as it implies that the project scope or budget is fixed and cannot accommodate changes. Asking the team to include the contingency plan in the iteration backlog is not appropriate, as the contingency plan should have been developed before the risk occurred and should be executed as soon as possible. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18-19, 456-457, 686-687.

According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager is responsible for identifying, analyzing, and responding to project risks, and documenting them in the risk register (Section 11.1). If the project manager discovers that the same team has been missing delivery dates in previous projects, this indicates that there is a potential risk that may affect the project schedule and performance. The project manager should include this in the risk register, and assign a probability and impact rating, a risk owner, and a risk response strategy. This will help the project manager to monitor and control the risk, and to take appropriate actions if the risk occurs. This is also consistent with the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, which states that one of the tasks of a business analyst is to “identify and analyze risks and opportunities related to the business need, requirements, and recommended solutions” (Task 3.5). References:

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Section 11.1

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Task 3.5

The project manager should use Monitor Communications techniques to ensure that the communication needs of the project and its stakeholders are met. This involves collecting and analyzing feedback from stakeholders, reviewing the effectiveness and quality of the communication activities, and identifying and resolving communication issues. By doing so, the project manager may discover the reasons why some stakeholders are not fully comprehending the status of the project based on the reports that are being circulated, and may initiate changes to the communications management plan to address them. For example, the project manager may decide to use a different report format, frequency, or distribution method that suits the needs and preferences of the new stakeholders. Adding the issue to the issue log and determining the corrective action (option A) is a possible outcome of Monitor Communications, but not the best answer. Creating a fishbone diagram to determine the root cause for the misunderstanding (option B) is a tool that can be used in Monitor Communications, but not the only one. Sharing the communications management plan and reminding all stakeholders of the agreed-upon reporting templates (option D) is not likely to solve the problem, as it may imply that the new stakeholders are at fault for not understanding the reports, rather than acknowledging that the communication needs may have changed. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 386-387, section 10.2 Manage Communications

PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 415, question 415, answer and explanation

 According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager is responsible for managing the project resources, including human resources, and ensuring that they have the necessary skills and competencies to perform the project work. Therefore, the project manager should identify the sources and specifics of the knowledge gap from the interns and new recruits, and put them into groups and assign a SME as a mentor. These actions will help the project manager to address the root cause of the problem, provide effective learning and coaching opportunities for the interns and new recruits, and leverage the expertise and experience of the SMEs. Hiring more SMEs and informing the human resources manager to lay off the nonperforming interns and new recruits may not be feasible or ethical. The project manager should try to resolve the issue within the existing project team, rather than replacing or firing the team members. Initiating a project change request for additional budget to train the interns and new recruits may not be possible or timely. The project manager should try to use the available resources and budget, rather than requesting more funds. Ignoring the issues with the project and trying to deliver the project successfully without asking for training funds may not be realistic or responsible. The project manager should not overlook the knowledge gap that may affect the project quality, scope, or schedule, but rather seek to close the gap and improve the team performance. References: PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.2 (Develop Team) and Section 9.3 (Manage Team)QUESTION NO: 449

According to the PMBOK Guide1, project communication management includes the processes of planning, managing, and monitoring project communications. The first process, plan communications management, involves determining the information and communication needs of the project stakeholders, such as the sponsor. The project manager should have analyzed the sponsor’s communication requirements, such as the type, format, frequency, and level of detail of the information they need, as well as their preferred communication channels and methods. By doing so, the project manager could have designed and implemented a communication system that meets the sponsor’s expectations and needs, and avoids any dissatisfaction or complaints. The other options are not the best preventive actions, as they are either reactive or irrelevant. Confirming that the portal is providing adequate information, verifying that the project team is following the communications management plan, and ensuring the sponsor had the necessary skills to use the portal are all actions that could be taken after the situation has occurred, but they do not address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of alignment between the communication system and the sponsor’s requirements. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition

Project Communication Management - Five Steps | PMI

ProjectManagement.com - Project Communication Management

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should use a collaborative or problem-solving approach to handle conflicts, as it results in a win-win situation and enhances the project performance1. The project manager should also communicate with the team members and involve them in the decision-making process, as it fosters trust and commitment2. Therefore, the best option is to meet the team member and try to plan a course of action together. Option A is incorrect because guiding the team member on how to resolve the conflict may not address the root cause of the conflict or the impact on the project schedule. Option B is incorrect because analyzing the project schedule and looking for alternatives may not consider the team member’s perspective or input. Option C is incorrect because performing crashing and/or fast tracking of the schedule may not resolve the conflict or may introduce new risks or issues to the project. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.5.2.1, p. 363 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.4.2.3, p. 356

According to the PMBOK® Guide Seventh Edition, one of the project management principles is to engage stakeholders actively and frequently. This means that the project manager should identify and analyze the needs, expectations, and interests of all stakeholders, and involve them appropriately throughout the project life cycle. The stakeholder register is a document that lists the key stakeholders, their roles, responsibilities, and level of influence on the project. The stakeholder engagement plan is a document that describes the strategies and actions to communicate with, manage, and influence the stakeholders.

In this scenario, the project manager has discovered that the local community was not included in the stakeholder register, which has caused them to oppose the project. This is a serious issue that can affect the project’s performance, reputation, and acceptance. Therefore, the project manager should not disregard these stakeholders, as this would violate the principle of stakeholder engagement and potentially escalate the conflict. The project manager should also not just explain to the community members why they were not included as stakeholders, as this would not address their concerns or expectations. The best option is to update the stakeholder register and revise the stakeholder engagement plan, as this would allow the project manager to acknowledge the community as a stakeholder, assess their impact and interest, and develop appropriate strategies and actions to engage them effectively and proactively. References:

PMBOK® Guide Seventh Edition, page 9

Project Management Principles 9-12, Episode 479: Project Management Principles 9-12 (Free)

The project manager should identify adequate change management tools to conduct the project, as this will help them to manage the changes to the product baseline in a flexible and efficient way. Change management tools are methods, techniques, or software that help to plan, execute, monitor, and control changes in a project. Some examples of change management tools are change request forms, change logs, configuration management systems, traceability matrices, and change impact analysis. By using these tools, the project manager can ensure that the changes are properly documented, evaluated, approved, implemented, and communicated. This will also help to minimize the risks and costs associated with the changes, and to maintain the quality and scope of the product. References:

Change Request Form: Definition, Types, Process & Tools

Change Log Template - Project Management Docs

Configuration Management: What is it and why is it important?

Traceability Matrix in Software Testing with Example Template

Change Impact Analysis - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager is responsible for managing the project scope and ensuring that the project delivers the agreed-upon features and functionality (Section 5.1). If a stakeholder tells the project manager that the main requested feature in the contract is not applicable, this means that there is a significant change in the project scope, which may affect the project cost, schedule, quality, and customer satisfaction. The project manager should not ignore this information, nor should they ask the sponsor to close the project or pay the penalty, as this may damage the relationship with the customer and the reputation of the organization. Instead, the project manager should check with the team to learn what can be done, and consult an expert if needed, to find out the impact of the scope change and the possible alternatives. The project manager should also communicate with the stakeholder and the sponsor to understand the reason for the scope change, and to negotiate a mutually acceptable solution. This is also consistent with the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, which states that one of the tasks of a business analyst is to “assess the impact of a proposed change or solution on the business need, requirements, and stakeholder expectations” (Task 3.4). References:

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Section 5.1

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Task 3.4

Answer steps

 The project manager should meet with the team member’s functional manager to try to remove the impediment that is preventing the team member from completing their user story. The project manager should explain the impact of the delay on the project scope, schedule, and quality, and negotiate a solution that would allow the team member to resume their work on the user story as soon as possible. This approach is consistent with the agile principle of removing impediments and enabling self-organizing teams12. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 5: Project Scope Management 2: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 2: An Agile Mindset

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project management plan is a formal, approved document that defines how the project is executed, monitored, and controlled1. It integrates and consolidates all of the subsidiary plans and baselines from the project management processes1. One of the inputs to the process of developing the project management plan is the project charter, which provides the high-level description of the project and its boundaries, as well as the high-level requirements, risks, assumptions, and constraints2. Therefore, the project manager should clarify the high-level business requirements with the event organizer as a basis for forming the deliverables list, which is part of the project scope management plan, a component of the project management plan3. The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to complete the task of developing the project management plan. Benchmarking other similar exhibitions’ deliverable lists and final outcomes is a technique that can be used to collect requirements, but it is not sufficient to form the deliverables list without clarifying the high-level business requirements first. Initiating a survey to solicit end-customer opinions and prioritize exhibition contents is also a technique to collect requirements, but it is not the first step in developing the project management plan. Initiating an additional services agreement in case the key deliverables list was not clearly stated in the contract is a risk response strategy that can be used to deal with potential scope changes, but it is not a necessary action to develop the project management plan. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 89

2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 77

3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 131

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 148

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 443

 According to the PMBOK Guide, daily standup meetings are a common tool used in agile and hybrid project management approaches. They are short, time-boxed meetings that allow the project team to communicate their progress, issues, and plans for the day. Daily standup meetings can enhance collaboration, transparency, and alignment among the project team members. However, some team members may resist or challenge the use of daily standup meetings, especially if they are not familiar with them or perceive them as a waste of time. In this situation, the project manager should define the ground rules, responsibilities, and conflict management strategies for the project team. The project manager should explain the purpose and benefits of daily standup meetings, and establish clear expectations and guidelines for their conduct. The project manager should also assign roles and responsibilities to the team members, such as facilitator, timekeeper, recorder, etc. The project manager should also address any conflicts or issues that may arise from the use of daily standup meetings, and resolve them in a constructive and respectful manner. The project manager should not engage an external vendor, request new team members, or update the project schedule, as these actions may not address the root cause of the team’s resistance or challenge to the daily standup meetings. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, …

 According to the PMBOK Guide, quantitative risk analysis is a process that numerically analyzes the effect of identified risks on overall project objectives. It is usually performed on risks that have been prioritized by the qualitative risk analysis process. Quantitative risk analysis requires specialized skills and tools, such as statistical analysis, simulation, and modeling. Therefore, not every project team member may have the knowledge or experience to perform this task. If the project manager encounters such a situation, the best option is to help the team member to perform the quantitative risk analysis through coaching, mentoring and training. This way, the project manager can ensure that the team member learns the necessary skills and techniques, and can contribute to the risk management process. This also aligns with the project manager’s responsibility to develop the project team and enhance their competencies. Option A is not the best answer because contacting the PMO and requesting another team member may cause delays and disruptions in the project schedule and team dynamics. Option B is not the best answer because escalating the issue to the functional manager may not solve the problem, and may create conflict between the project manager and the functional manager. Option D is not the best answer because performing the quantitative risk analysis for the team member may not be feasible or efficient, and may deprive the team member of the opportunity to learn and grow. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 431-432, 440-441.

According to the PMBOK Guide, scope management in agile projects is different from scope management in predictive life cycle projects. In agile projects, the scope is not fixed or detailed at the beginning of the project, but rather it is progressively elaborated and refined throughout the project. Agile projects use an adaptive and iterative approach to deliver value to the customer in short and frequent increments, called sprints or iterations. Agile projects use techniques such as user stories, product backlog, story mapping, story points, and minimum viable product (MVP) to define, prioritize, estimate, and validate the scope. Therefore, the project manager should spend a short amount of time defining the scope and building prototypes to refine the requirements, rather than creating a detailed scope baseline or a rigid plan. By doing so, the project manager can:

Involve the customer and the team in defining and clarifying the scope

Incorporate feedback and changes quickly and easily

Deliver the most valuable features and functionalities first

Reduce waste and rework

Increase customer satisfaction and trust

The other options are not the best choices, because:

Creating a scope baseline and putting the rest as backlog activities would limit the flexibility and responsiveness of the project, and would not allow the scope to evolve based on customer needs and feedback.

Estimating the work the team can complete and defining story sizes to keep the project under control would be part of the scope management process, but not the only or the best way to manage and control the scope. The project manager should also prioritize, validate, and adjust the scope as the project progresses.

Developing a plan to complete more work in less time would not be realistic or sustainable, and would compromise the quality and value of the project. The project manager should focus on delivering the right work, not more work. References:

Scope Management | PMI

Agile Scope Management: Refactor Your PMP - LeadingAgile

Considerations for Agile/Adaptive Projects | PMP - GreyCampus

The project manager should follow the risk management plan that was developed during the planning phase of the project. The risk management plan should include a risk register that identifies the potential risks, their probability and impact, and the planned responses for each risk. Since the labor union contract negotiation was documented as a risk, the project manager should log the issue and execute the risk response plan that was prepared for this situation. This may involve implementing contingency plans, fallback plans, or workarounds to minimize the negative effects of the risk on the project objectives. The other options are not appropriate because they do not follow the risk management plan or they introduce new risks or changes to the project scope, schedule, or budget. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 11: Project Risk Management, pp. 397-441.

PMP® Examination Practice Questions: 400 Practice Questions and Answers to help you Pass, Question 400, p. 401.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, a root cause analysis is a technique used to identify the underlying reasons for the occurrence of a problem or a deviation from the expected performance. It is part of the monitor and control project work process, which involves tracking, reviewing, and reporting the project progress and performance, and implementing corrective or preventive actions as needed. A root cause analysis can help the project manager to understand the causes of the budget shift and to take appropriate actions to address them. It can also help to prevent similar problems from happening again in the future. Adjusting the original budget estimates, negotiating the project changes, or reviewing the activity duration are possible actions that the project manager can take after performing a root cause analysis, but they are not the first step to do when faced with a significant budget shift. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 121-122, 4.5 Monitor and Control Project Work

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 686-687, Root Cause Analysis

PMP Sample Test Questions, question 1, answer D

According to the PMP Exam Content Outline, one of the tasks of the project manager is to “Assess stakeholder needs, interests, values, and influence, and determine the appropriate approach for engaging stakeholders across the project life cycle” (Task 1, Domain I: People). This implies that the project manager should evaluate the engagement needs of stakeholders based on their expectations, requirements, preferences, and level of influence and interest in the project. By doing so, the project manager can tailor the communication and collaboration methods to ensure high involvement from the stakeholders throughout the project. This will help to build trust, manage expectations, and increase stakeholder satisfaction. References:

PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain I: People, Task 1, page 61

PBA Exam Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 3, page 102

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), Sixth Edition, Chapter 13: Project Stakeholder Management, Section 13.2: Plan Stakeholder Engagement, page 5133

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 4: Needs Assessment, Section 4.2: Identify Stakeholders, page 694

Team velocity is a measure of the amount of work a team can complete in a given time period, usually a sprint or iteration. It is calculated by adding up the story points or effort estimates of the user stories that were completed and accepted during the sprint. Team velocity can help project managers and teams to plan, monitor, and improve their performance and delivery. However, team velocity can vary due to various factors, such as changes in scope, team size, team skills, dependencies, risks, and impediments. Impediments are any issues or obstacles that prevent the team from achieving their goals or performing at their optimal level. Impediments can be internal or external, technical or non-technical, and can affect the team’s productivity, quality, morale, or collaboration. Some examples of impediments are: lack of resources, unclear requirements, technical debt, bugs, conflicts, communication gaps, etc. Therefore, it is important for the project manager and the team to identify, track, and resolve impediments as soon as possible, to avoid negative impacts on the team velocity and the project outcome. One of the best ways to do this is to use the daily standup meeting, which is a short, time-boxed, and focused meeting where the team members share their progress, plans, and problems. The standup meeting can help the project manager and the team to: - Align on the sprint goals and priorities - Monitor the team’s progress and performance - Identify any impediments or risks that are affecting or could affect the team’s velocity - Assign ownership and accountability for resolving the impediments - Collaborate and support each other to overcome the challenges - Adapt and adjust the plan as needed to meet the sprint and project objectives By using the standup meeting to assess impediments and problems, the project manager can help the team to improve their velocity and meet the next review gate goal. The other options are not the best choices, because: - Increasing the sprint duration to allow the team more time would violate the agile principle of delivering value in short and frequent iterations, and would not address the root causes of the low velocity. - Prioritizing the contents of the backlog and removing some stories would reduce the scope and quality of the project, and would not solve the impediments that are affecting the team’s velocity. - Creating a change request to modify the gate review goals would delay the project delivery and increase the cost and risk of the project, and would not improve the team’s performance or velocity. References:

Velocity Chart in Project Management – What Is It and How Do You Use It?

What is Velocity in Agile?

Velocity - Project Management Knowledge

PMP Questions velocity

How to Calculate Team Velocity

What is team velocity and how to calculate it

The project manager should schedule a kick-off session to explain the problems of the project and gain approval and support from the stakeholders. This will help to align the expectations, clarify the objectives, and address the concerns of the stakeholders. A kick-off session is a tool and technique of the Develop Project Charter process, which is the first process in the project integration management knowledge area. Sending communications for clarification, demonstrating the performance indexes and recommending corrective actions, or speaking with the sponsor and explaining the situation are all possible actions that the project manager can take after the kick-off session, but they are not the first action that the project manager should take to alleviate the stakeholders’ concerns. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 49; Agile Practice Guide, page 26.

 The stakeholder engagement plan is a subsidiary plan of the project management plan that identifies the strategies and actions required to promote productive involvement of stakeholders in project decisions and execution. It is a dynamic document that should be updated throughout the project as stakeholder needs and expectations change. The project manager should explain to the key stakeholder that their needs will be updated in the stakeholder engagement plan and that their continued participation is important for the project success. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 13.2.3.1; Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Guide, 2nd edition, section 4.2.3.1.

According to the PMI-PBA guide, one of the key competencies of a business analyst is to facilitate collaboration and negotiation among stakeholders1. This is especially important in agile projects, where the business analyst may also act as the project manager or product owner2. The PMBOK guide also states that the project manager should foster a collaborative project team environment that enhances individual and team performance3. Therefore, the best way for the project manager to influence the agile team is to express trust in their ability to deliver value and meet the project objectives, rather than imposing authority, control, or additional resources. References:

1: PMI-PBA guide, page 16

2: PMI-PBA guide, page 23

3: PMBOK guide, page 59

The project manager should conduct a meeting to help the team define the team charter, which is a document that describes the team’s purpose, vision, values, norms, roles, and responsibilities. The team charter is a useful tool for establishing the team’s identity, direction, and expectations, as well as fostering the team’s collaboration, communication, and commitment. The project manager should facilitate the team’s involvement and participation in creating the team charter, and ensure that the team charter is aligned with the project’s objectives and scope. The project manager should also review and update the team charter regularly, as the team evolves and adapts to the changing project environment.

The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to take in this situation. Planning an outdoor activity for the team to get to know each other may be a good idea for building the team’s rapport and trust, but it is not sufficient to address the team’s problems in meeting goals. The project manager should also focus on clarifying the team’s vision, values, and expectations, and providing the team with guidance and support on the agile project management approaches. Asking the team to review agile project management approaches may be helpful for enhancing the team’s knowledge and skills, but it is not enough to solve the team’s issues in meeting goals. The project manager should also ensure that the team understands and agrees on the team’s purpose, roles, and responsibilities, and that the team has the necessary tools and resources to perform the work and deliver the product. Asking the human resources department for an experienced agile team may not be feasible or desirable, as it may disrupt the existing team’s dynamics and relationships, as well as increase the project’s cost and risk. The project manager should not replace the team members without a valid reason, but rather help them to develop and improve their agile competencies and capabilities. References:

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.1.3.1, “Team Charter”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Appendix X3, Section X3.2.2.1, “Agile Manifesto and Mindset”

PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide: 2021 Exam Update, 10th Edition, Chapter 8, Section 8.2, “Planning Resources” 1

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should communicate the organizational culture and project goal to the external stakeholders in a formal and written manner. This will help the stakeholders understand the context, scope, objectives, and deliverables of the project, as well as the roles and responsibilities of the project team and other stakeholders. A report is an appropriate communication tool for this purpose, as it can provide a comprehensive and structured overview of the project information. The other options are either too informal, indirect, or ineffective for communicating the organizational culture and project goal to the external stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 376-377, section 10.1.2.1.

QUE : A self-organizing team is a team that has the autonomy and authority to manage its own work and make its own decisions. A self-organizing team is also expected to adapt to changing situations and learn new skills as needed. Therefore, the best management decision for this situation is to provide opportunity for team members to learn and adjust to the new technology, rather than moving them, adding new members, or re-assigning the project. This will help the team overcome the learning curve and improve their velocity in the future. It will also foster trust, collaboration, and innovation within the team. Providing opportunity for team members to learn and adjust to the technology is consistent with the agile principles and values, which emphasize continuous improvement, customer satisfaction, and team empowerment. It is also covered in the PMBOK Guide under the Develop Team process, and in the PMI-PBA Exam Content Outline under Domain III: Analysis. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 247

PMI-PBA Exam Content Outline, 2018, page 11

Agile Manifesto

STION NO: 184 DRAG DROP

Drag the interpersonal skill on the left to the correct scenario on the right.

Answer:

 According to the PMI, a hybrid approach is a combination of two or more project methodologies, such as waterfall and agile, to suit the needs of the project. A hybrid approach can offer flexibility, adaptability, and customer focus, while also maintaining some level of predictability, structure, and control. However, a hybrid approach can also pose some challenges, such as stakeholder resistance, misalignment, or confusion. Therefore, the project manager needs to address and remove any obstacles and blockers that may prevent the team from achieving their goals. Obstacles and blockers are issues or impediments that hinder or stop the team’s progress, such as lack of resources, unclear requirements, technical debt, conflicts, communication gaps, etc. The project manager should follow these steps to address and remove obstacles and blockers for the team:

Identify the obstacles and blockers by using various techniques, such as daily stand-up meetings, retrospectives, feedback sessions, surveys, etc.

Analyze the impact, root cause, and priority of the obstacles and blockers by using tools, such as issue logs, risk registers, impact analysis, root cause analysis, prioritization matrix, etc.

Develop and implement solutions to remove the obstacles and blockers by using methods, such as problem-solving, negotiation, escalation, delegation, collaboration, etc.

Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the solutions by using measures, such as team velocity, customer satisfaction, quality metrics, etc.

Communicate and report the status and results of the solutions to the relevant stakeholders, such as the team, the sponsor, the customer, etc.

By addressing and removing obstacles and blockers for the team, the project manager can improve the project performance, as well as the team’s productivity, quality, morale, and collaboration.

The other options are not the best choices, because:

Asking stakeholders to communicate with the project manager and not directly with the team would create a communication bottleneck, reduce transparency, and increase the risk of misunderstanding or miscommunication.

Empowering the team members to remove obstacles and blockers would be a good practice, but it would not be sufficient without the project manager’s support, guidance, and intervention, especially if the obstacles and blockers are beyond the team’s authority or capability.

Adding blockers to the issue log and risk management plan would be a necessary step, but it would not be enough without taking action to resolve them. Simply documenting the blockers would not help the team to overcome them or improve their performance. References:

Hybrid Project Management: What is it, Methodology & Software - Teamhood

Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success

Impediments, Obstacles, and Blockers: How to Address and Remove Them

1.7. Address and remove impediments, obstacles, and blockers for the team - KnowledgeMap

1.7 Address and Remove Impediments, Obstacles, and Blockers … - BrainBOK

 According to the PMBOK Guide, one of the tools and techniques for performing integrated change control is risk analysis1. This involves assessing the potential impact of a change request or a defect on the project objectives, such as scope, schedule, cost, and quality. By performing risk analysis, the project manager can evaluate the pros and cons of deploying the system with the defect, and determine the best course of action. The other options are not appropriate, as they do not address the issue of whether to deploy the system or not. Proposing a solution redesign, revising the quality control measurements, and developing a mitigation plan are all possible actions that could be taken after performing risk analysis, depending on the results. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 120

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 141, the project manager should engage with stakeholders throughout the project life cycle to ensure that their needs and expectations are met. When there are changes in the stakeholder environment, such as new or replaced stakeholders, the project manager should identify them and assess their impact on the project. The project manager should also review and prioritize the new requirements with the stakeholders and analyze how they affect the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk. The project manager should then follow the change control process to submit, evaluate, approve, and implement the change requests that are needed to accommodate the new requirements. This approach ensures that the project manager maintains effective communication, collaboration, and alignment with the stakeholders, and delivers a product, service, or result that meets their needs and expectations.

The other options are not the best choices because they do not address the new requirements in a proactive and collaborative manner. Option B is not the best choice because it implies that the project manager is trying to avoid the new requirements and resist the change, which could create conflict and dissatisfaction among the stakeholders. Option C is not the best choice because it implies that the project manager is accepting all the new requirements without analyzing their impact and feasibility, which could lead to scope creep, unrealistic expectations, and poor quality. Option D is not the best choice because it implies that the project manager is imposing a rigid and inflexible approach to the project, which could alienate the new stakeholders and jeopardize their support and engagement.

 The project manager should have allocated additional time for mentoring the intern, as this would have helped the intern to learn faster and perform better. Mentoring is a key practice in agile projects, as it helps to transfer knowledge, skills, and experience from senior to junior team members. It also fosters collaboration, trust, and feedback within the team. By allocating more time for mentoring, the project manager could have ensured that the intern was adequately supported and prepared to take over the critical role. This would have reduced the risk of delays and quality issues in the project. References:

Role of Agile Mentor - PM Majik

Mentoring | Scrum.org

Agile Team Roles: The 7 Most Important People in Agile Project

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project management plan is a formal, approved document that defines how the project is executed, monitored, and controlled1. It integrates and consolidates all of the subsidiary plans and baselines from the project management processes1. One of the subsidiary plans is the procurement management plan, which describes how the project will acquire goods and services from outside the performing organization2. The procurement management plan should include the procurement strategy, the types of contracts, the procurement documents, the source selection criteria, the roles and responsibilities, the make-or-buy decisions, and the assumptions and constraints2. Therefore, the project manager should have communicated the project management plan, including the procurement management plan, to the procurement division earlier in the project to ensure the purchase of the specific equipment. The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to have done earlier in the project. Communicating the project charter to the procurement division may not be sufficient, as the project charter only provides the high-level description of the project and its boundaries, not the details of the procurement activities3. Including a procurement division member on the project team may not be necessary or feasible, as the project team may have limited authority or influence over the procurement division’s policies and procedures. Reminding the project sponsor about the procurement division’s reputation is not a constructive or professional way to deal with the issue, as it may create conflict or resentment between the parties. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 89

2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 463

3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 77

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 33

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 558

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the project steering committee is a group of senior stakeholders who provide strategic direction, guidance, and support to the project. The project steering committee is also responsible for resolving high-level issues and risks that may affect the project. In this scenario, the project manager should escalate the issue of funding access to the project steering committee, as they have the authority and influence to resolve it. The project steering committee can help to expedite the funding process, negotiate with the finance department, or find alternative sources of funding. This will help to avoid further delays and ensure the project can proceed with the procurement process. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 33-34. PMP Questions page 524, question 524. [Project Steering Committee: Roles and Responsibilities].

To answer this question, we need to calculate the earned value (EV), the planned value (PV), and the actual cost (AC) of the project based on the given information. Then, we can compare them to determine the project status in terms of schedule and cost performance.

The earned value (EV) is the monetary value of the work completed so far. It can be calculated by multiplying the percent complete of the project by the budget at completion (BAC), which is the total approved budget for the project. The BAC can be obtained by adding the approved work package cost estimates, the contingency reserves, and the management reserves. In this case, the BAC is:

BAC=9500+500+(10%×500)=10550

The EV is then:

EV=50%×10550=5275

The planned value (PV) is the monetary value of the work that was planned to be completed by a certain date. It can be calculated by multiplying the planned percent of the project by the BAC. In this case, the PV is:

PV=40%×10550=4220

The actual cost (AC) is the monetary value of the work actually performed. It is given as:

AC=4500

To determine the project status, we can use the cost variance (CV) and the schedule variance (SV) formulas. The CV is the difference between the EV and the AC, and it indicates whether the project is under budget or over budget. A positive CV means the project is under budget, while a negative CV means the project is over budget. The CV is:

CV=EV−AC=5275−4500=775

The SV is the difference between the EV and the PV, and it indicates whether the project is ahead of schedule or behind schedule. A positive SV means the project is ahead of schedule, while a negative SV means the project is behind schedule. The SV is:

SV=EV−PV=5275−4220=1055

From the CV and SV values, we can conclude that the project is under budget and ahead of schedule. To find the percentage of deviation from the planned cost and schedule, we can use the cost performance index (CPI) and the schedule performance index (SPI) formulas. The CPI is the ratio of the EV to the AC, and it measures the cost efficiency of the project. A CPI greater than 1 means the project is under budget, while a CPI less than 1 means the project is over budget. The CPI is:

CPI=ACEV​=45005275​=1.17

The SPI is the ratio of the EV to the PV, and it measures the schedule efficiency of the project. A SPI greater than 1 means the project is ahead of schedule, while a SPI less than 1 means the project is behind schedule. The SPI is:

SPI=PVEV​=42205275​=1.25

From the CPI and SPI values, we can calculate the percentage of deviation from the planned cost and schedule by subtracting 1 and multiplying by 100. The percentage of deviation from the planned cost is:

(CPI−1)×100=(1.17−1)×100=17%

The percentage of deviation from the planned schedule is:

(SPI−1)×100=(1.25−1)×100=25%

Therefore, the project cost is 17% lower than planned, and the project schedule is 25% ahead of planned. Among the given options, the closest one is B. The project cost is 10% lower than planned.